Towards a Trust and Reputation Framework for Social Web Platforms
Trust and Reputation Systems (TRSs) represent a significant trend in decision support for Internet-based interactions. They help users to decide whom to trust and how much to trust a transaction. They are also an effective mechanism to encourage honesty and cooperation among users, resulting in healthy online markets or communities. The basic idea is to let parties rate each other so that new public knowledge can be created from personal experiences. The major difficulty in designing a reputation system is making it robust against malicious attacks. Our contribution in this paper is twofold. Firstly, we combine multiple research agendas into a holistic approach to building a robust TRS. Secondly, we focus on one TRS component which is the reputation computing engine and provide a novel investigation into an implementation of the engine proposed in .
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Dellarocas, C.: Online reputation systems: How to design one that does what you need. MIT Sloan Management Review 51(3) (spring 2010)Google Scholar
- 4.Josang, A., Golbeck, J.: Challenges for robust trust and reputation systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Security and Trust Management, Saint Malo, France (September 2009)Google Scholar
- 6.MacQueen, J.B.: Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, pp. 281–297 (1967)Google Scholar
- 8.Marmol, F.G., Perez, G.M.: Trmsim-wsn, trust and reputation models simulator for wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE ICC 2009), Communication and Information Systems Security Symposium (June 2009)Google Scholar
- 9.Marti, S.: Trust and Reputation in Peer-to-Peer Networks. PhD thesis, Stanford University. Stanford InfoLab (May 2005)Google Scholar
- 10.Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., Kuwabara, K.: Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, pp. 45–48 (December 2000)Google Scholar