Brain-Computer Interface Games: Towards a Framework

  • Hayrettin Gürkök
  • Anton Nijholt
  • Mannes Poel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7522)

Abstract

The brain-computer interface (BCI) community started to consider games as potential applications while the games community started to consider BCI as a game controller. However, there is a discrepancy between the BCI games developed by the two communities. In this paper, we propose a preliminary BCI games framework that we constructed with respect to the research conducted in both the BCI and the games communities. Developers can situate their BCI games within this framework and benefit from the guidelines we provide and also extend the framework further.

Keywords

Brain-computer interface games flow presence challenge fantasy sociality concentration 

References

  1. 1.
    Blythe, M., Hassenzahl, M.: The semantics of fun: Differentiating enjoyable eeperiences. In: Funology, pp. 91–100. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, E., Cairns, P.: A grounded investigation of game immersion. In: CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts, pp. 1297–1300. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chanel, G., Pelli, S., Ravaja, N., Kuikkaniemi, K.: Social interaction using mobile devices and biofeedback. Presented at BioS-Play 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Csíkszentmihályi, M.: Flow. Harper Perennial (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    di Russo, F., Spinelli, D.: Effects of sustained, voluntary attention on amplitude and latency of steady-state visual evoked potential. Clinical Neurophysiology 113(11), 1771–1777 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Finke, A., Lenhardt, A., Ritter, H.: The MindGame: A P300-based brain-computer interface game. Neural Networks 22(9), 1329–1333 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gürkök, H., Nijholt, A.: Brain-computer interfaces for multimodal interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 28(5), 292–307 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hjelm, S.I.: Research+design: the making of Brainball. Interactions 10(1), 26–34 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    International Society for Presence Research: The Concept of Presence: Explication Statement (2000), http://ispr.info/about-presence-2/about-presence/
  10. 10.
    Janssen, J.H., Bailenson, J.N., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Westerink, J.H.D.M.: Intimate heartbeats. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 1(2), 72–80 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Krepki, R., Blankertz, B., Curio, G., Müller, K.R.: The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI). Multimedia Tools and Applications 33(1), 73–90 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lazzaro, N.: Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story (March 2004), http://www.xeodesign.com/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf
  13. 13.
    Martinez, P., Bakardjian, H., Cichocki, A.: Fully online multicommand brain-computer interface with visual neurofeedback using SSVEP paradigm. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience 2007, 94561 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mateer, C.A., Sohlberg, M.M. (eds.): Cognitive Rehabilitation: An Integrative Neuropsychological Approach, 2nd edn. The Guilford Press (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Middendorf, M., McMillan, G., Calhoun, G., Jones, K.: Brain-computer interfaces based on the steady-state visual-evoked response. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering 8(2), 211–214 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mühl, C., Gürkök, H., Plass-Oude Bos, D., Thurlings, M., Scherffig, L., Duvinage, M., Elbakyan, A., Kang, S., Poel, M., Heylen, D.: Bacteria Hunt. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 4(1), 11–25 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Plass-Oude Bos, D., Reuderink, B., van de Laar, B., Gürkök, H., Mühl, C., Poel, M., Nijholt, A., Heylen, D.: Brain-computer interfacing and games. In: Brain-Computer Interfaces, pp. 149–178. Springer (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Riva, G.: Is presence a technology issue? Virtual Reality 13(3), 159–169 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rouse, R.: Game Design: Theory & Practice. 2nd edn. Wordware (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sheldon, K.M., Elliot, A.J., Kim, Y., Kasser, T.: What is satisfying about satisfying events? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80(2), 325–339 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sobell, N., Trivich, M.: Brainwave drawing game. In: Delicate Balance: Technics, Culture and Consequences, pp. 360–362. IEEE (1989)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sweetser, P., Wyeth, P.: Gameflow. Computers in Entertainment 3(3), 1–24 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tangermann, M., Krauledat, M., Grzeska, K., Sagebaum, M., Blankertz, B., Vidaurre, C., Müller, K.R.: Playing Pinball with non-invasive BCI. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 21, pp. 1641–1648. The MIT Press (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wolpaw, J.R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D.J., Pfurtscheller, G., Vaughan, T.M.: Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control. Clinical Neurophysiology 113(6), 767–791 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hayrettin Gürkök
    • 1
  • Anton Nijholt
    • 1
  • Mannes Poel
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Media InteractionUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations