Context-Sensitive User-Centered Scalability: An Introduction Focusing on Exergames and Assistive Systems in Work Contexts

  • Oliver Korn
  • Michael Brach
  • Albrecht Schmidt
  • Thomas Hörz
  • Robert Konrad
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7516)

Abstract

This paper introduces an approach for implementing context-sensitive user-centered scalability (CSUCS) into interactive applications using motion recognition. With scalability we refer to a system’s ability to adapt to the physical and cognitive abilities of a specific user. We discuss an adapted HAAT-model (Human Activity Assistive Technology Model) and the flow concept and show their use in two prototypical implementations: An “exergame” enriching sports exercises for the elderly and an assistive system using gamification elements to enrich the working experience of impaired and elderly persons.

Both systems have in common that they use motion detection and mechanics from game design (gamification). They transparently adapt to and visualize the users’ performance. The real-time analysis of the users’ movements is a prerequisite for the successful implementations of CSUCS.

Keywords

Assistive technology User-Centered Design Human Computer Interaction (HCI) Human Machine Interaction (HMI) Elderly Gamification Exergame Serious Games Augmented Reality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anders, T.R., Fozard, J.L., Lillyquist, T.D.: Effects of Age Upon Retrieval from Short-term Memory. Developmental Psychology 6(2), 214–217 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailey, R.W.: Human Performance Engineering Using Human Factors/Ergonomics to Achieve Computer System Usability, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1989)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Betz, D., Cieslik, S., Dinkelacker, P., Glende, S., et al.: Grundlegende Anforderungen an AAL-Technologien und -Systeme. In: Meyer, S., Mollenkopf, H. (Hrsg.) AAL in der alternden Gesellschaft. Anforderungen, Akzeptanz und Perspektiven, Berlin, pp. 63–108 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bogost, I.: The Rhetoric of Exergaming (2005), http://www.exergamefitness.com/pdf/The%20Rhetoric%20of%20Exergaming.pdf
  5. 5.
    Brach, M., Korn, O.: Assistive Technologies at Home and in the Workplace – A Field of Research for Exercise Science and Human Movement Science. EURAPA (European Review of Aging and Physical Activity) 9 (2012), doi:10.1007/s11556-012-0099-zGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brach, M., Hauer, K., Rotter, L., Werres, C., Korn, O., Konrad, R., Göbel, S.: Modern Principles of Training in Exergames for Sedentary Seniors: Requirements and Approaches for Sport and Exercise Science. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport (IJCSS) 11, 86–99 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., Nakamura, J.: Flow. In: Elliot, A. (ed.) Handbook of Competence and Motivation, New York, USA, pp. 598–669 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook, A.M., Hussey, S.M.: Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. Mosby, St. Louis (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farrow, A., Reynolds, F.: Health and Safety of the Older Worker. Occupational Medicine 62(1), 4–11 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freiberger, E., Sieber, C., Pfeifer, K.: Physical Activity, Exercise, and Sarcopenia - Future Challenges. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 161(17-18), 416–425 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goble, D.J., Coxon, J.P., Wenderoth, N., Van Impe, A., Swinnen, S.P.: Proprioceptive Sensibility in the Elderly: Degeneration, Functional Consequences and Plastic-adaptive Processes. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 33(3), 271–278 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korn, O., Schmidt, A., Hörz, T.: Assistive Systems in Production Environments: Exploring Motion Recognition and Gamification. In: Proceedings of the ACM PETRA 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Korn, O.: Industrial Playgrounds. How Gamification Helps to Enrich Work for Elderly or Impaired Persons in Production. In: Proceedings of the ACM EICS 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGonigal, J.: Reality is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. Random House, London (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nelson, M.E., Rejeski, W.J., Blair, S.N., Duncan, P.W., Judge, J.O., King, A.C., Macera, C.A., Castanda-Sceppa, C.: Physical Activity and Public Health in Older Adults. Recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation 116, 1094–1105 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shotton, J., Fitzgibbon, A., Cook, M., Sharp, T., Finocchio, M., Moore, R., Kipman, A., Blake, A.: Real-Time Human Pose Recognition in Parts from Single Depth Images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steg, H., Strese, H., Loroff, C., Hull, J., Schmidt, S.: Europe is Facing a Demographic Challenge. Ambient assisted living offers solutions. Report compiled within the Specific Support Action “Ambient Assisted Living”, Berlin (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wiemeyer, J., Kliem, A.: Serious Games in Prevention and Rehabilitation – A New Panacea for Elderly People? European Review of Aging and Physical Activity 9, 41–50 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Korn
    • 1
  • Michael Brach
    • 2
  • Albrecht Schmidt
    • 3
  • Thomas Hörz
    • 1
  • Robert Konrad
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences EsslingenEsslingenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Sport and Exercise SciencesUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany
  3. 3.University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  4. 4.KTX Software DevelopmentEgelsbachGermany

Personalised recommendations