Advertisement

“This Game Is Girly!” Perceived Enjoyment and Student Acceptance of Edutainment

  • Michail N. Giannakos
  • Konstantinos Chorianopoulos
  • Letizia Jaccheri
  • Nikos Chrisochoides
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7516)

Abstract

Serious video games that enable students to engage into topics as mathematics through an enjoyment process are becoming increasingly popular. However, there is lack of empirical evidence on the relationship between students’ enjoyment and their intention to use serious video games. This study is about a storytelling serious video game, which has the goal to improve the mathematical skills of players. The game has a plot, featuring a story in which a mission is assigned to the player. The story and the mission are used to stimulate the students’ interest and motivate them to play the game. The empirical study is a controlled experiment to which 46 Gymnasium (middle school) students participated. Results confirmed the positive effects of the enjoyment on students’ intention to use storytelling serious games. Notably, we found that gender has a moderating effect on the relationships between enjoyment and intention to use the game. The results of this study suggest that games with a storytelling component might be attractive to girls.

Keywords

Storytelling Serious Video Game Enjoyment Mathematics Experiment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baenninger, M., Newcombe, N.: Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences 7, 363–379 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6), 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berridge, K.C.: Pleasures of the brain. Brain Cogn. 52, 106–128 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonanno, P., Kommers, P.A.: Gender differences and styles in the use of digital games. Educational Psychology 25(1), 13–41 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brunner, C., Bennett, D., Honey, M.: Girl games and technological desire. In: Cassell, Jenkins (eds.) From Barbie to Mortal Kombat: Gender and Computer Games, pp. 72–89 (1998)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Casey, M.B.: Gender, Sex, and Cognition: Considering the Interrelationship between Biological and Environmental Factors. Learning and Individual Differences 8(1), 39–53 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cowley, B., Charles, D., Black, M., Hickey, R.: Toward an understanding of flow in video games. Comput. Entertain. 6(2), Article 20 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 48, 39–50 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giannakos, M.N., Vlamos, P.: Educational webcasts’ acceptance: Empirical examination and the role of experience. British Journal of Educational Technology (2012), doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01279.xGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giannakos, M.N., Chorianopoulos, K., Jaccheri, L.: Math is not only for Science Geeks: Design and Assessment of a Storytelling Serious Video Game. In: Proc. of ICALT (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hair Jr., J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L.: Multivariate data analysis, 6th edn. Prentice-Hall International, Upper saddle River (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnson, S.: Everything bad is good for you: How today’s popular culture is actually making us smarter. Allen Lane, London (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakatsu, R., Rauterberg, M., Vorderer, P.: A New Framework for Entertainment Computing: From Passive to Active Experience. In: Kishino, F., Kitamura, Y., Kato, H., Nagata, N. (eds.) ICEC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3711, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Phillips, C.A., Rolls, S., Rouse, A., Griffiths, M.: Home video game playing in schoolchildren: a study of incidence and patterns of play. Jour. of Adolescence 18, 687–691 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Salem, B., Rauterberg, M., Nakatsu, R.: Kansei Mediated Entertainment. In: Harper, R., Rauterberg, M., Combetto, M. (eds.) ICEC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4161, pp. 103–116. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sweetser, P., Wyeth, P.: GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput. Entertain. 3(3), 3 (2005), doi:10.1145/1077246.1077253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., Morris, M.G.: User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model. Decis. Sciences 33, 297–316 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vogler, C.: The writer’s journey: Mythic structures for writers. Michael Wiese Productions, Studio City (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yi, M.Y., Hwang, Y.: Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(4), 431–449 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michail N. Giannakos
    • 1
  • Konstantinos Chorianopoulos
    • 2
  • Letizia Jaccheri
    • 1
  • Nikos Chrisochoides
    • 3
  1. 1.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.Ionian UniversityCorfuGreece
  3. 3.Old Dominion UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations