Advertisement

Paving the Way for a Transformational Public Administration

  • Ioannis Savvas
  • Nick Bassiliades
  • Elias Pimenidis
  • Alexander B. Sideridis
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 99)

Abstract

Transformational government as a newborn scientific field seeks for implementation through integration of its components. As a contribution to this end this work impresses a Public Administration’s operation ontology modeling and an algorithm for tracing malfunctions and changing the case. PA is considered as a production unit and any administrative act as the output of its processes. This output creates effects and consequences which are to be met stakeholders’ goals in order to balance socioeconomic problems.

Keywords

Transformational government PA ontology modeling Service transformation algorithm stakeholder goals 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Irani, Z., Sahraoui, S., Ozkan, S., Ghoneim, A., Elliman, T.: T-Government for Benefit Realisation. In: Proceedings of European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Janssen, M., Shu, W.S.: Transformational Government: Basics and Key Issues. In: Proceedings of ICEGOV 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cabinet Office. Transformational Government 2006 Annual Report (2007) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weerakkody, V., Dhillon, G.: Moving from EGovernment to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Perspective. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 4, 1–16 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janssen, M.: Designing Electronic Intermediaries. An agent-based approach for designing interorganizational coordination mechanisms. Delft University of Technology, Doctoral Dissertation. Delft, The Netherlands (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janssen, M., Sol, H.G.: Evaluating the role of intermediaries in the electronic value chain. Internet Research- Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 10, 406–417 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Savvas, I., Bassiliades, N.: A Process-Oriented Ontology-Based Knowledge Management System for Facilitating Operational Procedures in Public Administration. Expert Systems with Applications 36(3-1), 4467–4478 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Savvas, I., Bassiliades, N., Kravari, K., Meditskos, G.: An Ontological Business Process Modeling Approach for Public Administration: The Case of Human Resource Management Handbook of Research on E-Business Standards and Protocols: Documents, Data and Advanced Web Technolgies book to be published by IGI Global (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bouckaert, G., Peters, B.G.: Performance Measurement and Management. The Achilles’ Heel in administrative modernization. Public Performance and Management Review 25(4), 359–362 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Dooren W.: Performance Measurement in the Flemish Public Sector: A Supply and Demand Approach. PhD dissertation, Faculteit Sociale. Wetenschappen - Onderzoekseenheid: Instituut voor de Overheid [IO], K.U. Leuven (2006) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Savvas, I., Bassiliades, N., Pimenidis, E., Sideridis, A.: A Public Administration Service Transformation Algorithm (under review)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Capgemini: Architecture and the Integrated Architecture Framework (2006), retrieved from, www.capgemini.com/resources/thought_leadership/architecture_and_the_integrated_architecture_framework/
  13. 13.
    Savvas, I., Pimenidis, E., Sideridis, A.: Using egov systems to remedy public service failings: in search of a “transformation” algorithm. In: Proceedings of eGovernment Workshop 2008, Brunel University, West London (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    UK CabinetOffice: e-Government Interoperability Framework, Version 6.1 (2005), http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/schemasstandards/egif_document.asp?docnum=949
  15. 15.
    Guijarro, L.: Semantic interoperability in eGovernment initiatives. Computer Standards & Interfaces (2007), doi:10.1016/j.csiGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guijarro, L.: Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Government Information Quarterly 24(1), 89–101 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guijarro, L.: Analysis of the Interoperability Frameworks in e-government Initiatives. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3183, pp. 36–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Naiman, C.E., Ouksel, A.M.: A classification of semantic conflicts in heterogeneous database systems. Journal of Organizational Computing 5(2), 167–193 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Park, J., Ram, S.: Information systems interoperability: what lies beneath? ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22(4), 595–632 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ram, S., Park, J.: Semantic Conflict Resolution Ontology (SCROL): an ontology for detecting and resolving data and schema-level semantic conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(2), 189–202 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    SICoP : Introducing semantic technologies and the vision of the semantic web, version 5.4, Semantic Interoperability Community of Practice, White Paper Series Module 1 (2005) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peristeras, V., Tarabanis, K., Goudos, S.K.: Model-driven eGovernment interoperability: A review of the state of the art. Computer Standards & Interfaces 31, 613–628 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gartner: Gartner Business Performance Framework v1.0 (2003), http://www.gartnerg2.com/fw/fwbpf.asp
  24. 24.
    Gartner: New performance framework measures public value of IT, Research Note (2003) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Savvas, I., Pimenidis, E., Sideridis, A.: Proposing a high-level requirements mapping framework, for testing implementation compatibility in e-government projects. In: Proceedings of ECEG. The 7th European Conference of e-Government, Den Haag, The Netherlands, June 21-22, pp. 459–468 (2007)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pollit, C., Bouckaert, G.: Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ioannis Savvas
    • 1
  • Nick Bassiliades
    • 2
  • Elias Pimenidis
    • 3
  • Alexander B. Sideridis
    • 1
  1. 1.Informatics LaboratoryAgricultural University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Aristotle University of ThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.University of East LondonUK

Personalised recommendations