Forking the Commons: Developmental Tensions and Evolutionary Patterns in Open Source Software

  • Mehmet Gençer
  • Bülent Özel
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 378)

Abstract

Open source software (OSS) presents opportunities and challenges for developers to exploit its commons based licensing regime by creating specializations of a software technology to address plurality of goals and priorities. By ‘forking’ a new branch of development separate from the main project, development diverges into a path in order to relieve tensions related to specialization, which later encounters new tensions. In this study, we first classify forces and patterns within this divergence process. Such tensions may stem from a variety of sources including internal power conflicts, emergence of new environmental niches such as demand for specialized uses of same software, or differences along stability vs. development speed trade-off. We then present an evolutionary model which combines divergence options available to resolve tensions, and how further tensions emerge. In developing this model we attempt to define open software evolution at the level of systems of software, rather than at individual software project level.

Keywords

Forking Divergence Specialization Software Evolution 

References

  1. 1.
    Aldrich, H.: Organizations Evolving. Sage (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Laat, P.B.: Copyright or copyleft?: An analysis of property regimes for software development. Research Policy 34(10), 1511–1532 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gencer, M., Oba, B.: Organising the digital commons: a case study on engagement strategies in open source. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 23(9), 969–982 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gencer, M., Ozel, B., Tunalioglu, V.S., Oba, B.: Forking: The gpl coherent technology for flexible organizing in foss development. In: European Group of Organizational Studies Colloqium in Bergen, Norway (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Godfrey, M., Tu, Q.: Evolution in open source software: a case study. In: Int. Conf. on Software Maintenance, pp. 131–142 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hayek, F.A.: The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review 35(4), 519–530 (1945)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hodgson, G.M., Knudsen, T.: Why we need a generalized darwinism, and why generalized darwinism is not enough. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 61(1), 1–19 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lehman, M.M.: Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution. Proceedings of the IEEE 68(9), 1060–1076 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mehmet Gençer
    • 1
  • Bülent Özel
    • 1
  1. 1.İstanbul Bilgi UniversityTurkey

Personalised recommendations