Open Source, Open Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights – A Lightning Talk

  • Terhi Kilamo
  • Imed Hammouda
  • Ville Kairamo
  • Petri Räsänen
  • Jukka P. Saarinen
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 378)

Abstract

Open innovation projects are fast paced aiming at producing a quick proof of concept of an innovative software product. This need for speedy results makes the use of open source components as a basis for the work appealing. Open source brings with it an inherent risk of license conflicts that may become an issue when aiming to develope an innovative demo into an actual product. In this study, the first results of investigating the knowledge the participants of innovation projects have on intellectual property are presented. The effect this may have on the project results is also discussed.

References

  1. 1.
    Alspaugh, T.A., Asuncion, H.U., Scacchi, W.: Analyzing software licenses in open architecture software systems. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ICSE Workshop on Emerging Trends in Free/Libre/Open Source Software Research and Development, FLOSS 2009, pp. 54–57. IEEE Computer Society Press (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chesbrough, H.: Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation. In: Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm. Oxford University Press (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Di Penta, M., German, D.M., Guéhéneuc, Y., Antoniol, G.: An exploratory study of the evolution of software licensing. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2010, vol. 1, pp. 145–154. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feller, J., Finnegan, P., Hayes, J., O’Reilly, P.: Institutionalising information asymmetry: governance structures for open innovation. Information Technology & People 22(4), 297–316 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fossology, http://fossology.org (last visited March 2012)
  6. 6.
    Germán, M., Di Penta, D., Davies: Understanding and auditing the licensing of open source software distributions. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Program Comprehension, pp. 84–93. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hoekstra, R., Breuker, J., Di Bello, M., Boer, A.: The LKIF Core Ontology of Basic Legal Concepts. In: Proceedings of LOAIT, pp. 43–63 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A license code indetification tool for source code, http://ninka.turingmachine.org/ (last visited March 2012)
  9. 9.
    Facilitating Innovation at Demola. Open Threads: Open Innovation Newsletter (April 2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Qualipso Project, http://www.qualipso.org/licenses-champion (last visited March 2012)
  11. 11.
    Demola Innovation Platform, http://www.demola.fi (last visited March 2012)
  12. 12.
    Tuunanen, T., Koskinen, J., Kärkkäinen, T.: Automated Software License Analysis. Automated Software Engineering 16(3-4), 455–490 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    West, J., Gallagher, S.: Challenges of Open Innovation: The Paradox of Firm Investment in Open-Source Software. R&D Management 36(3), 319–331 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terhi Kilamo
    • 1
  • Imed Hammouda
    • 1
  • Ville Kairamo
    • 2
  • Petri Räsänen
    • 2
  • Jukka P. Saarinen
    • 3
  1. 1.Tampere University of TechnologyFinland
  2. 2.Uusi Tehdas/New FactoryFinland
  3. 3.Nokia Research CenterFinland

Personalised recommendations