A Model of Open Source Developer Foundations

  • Dirk Riehle
  • Sebastian Berschneider
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 378)

Abstract

Many community open source projects are of high economic relevance. As these projects mature, their leaders face a choice of continuing the project as is, making the project join an existing foundation, or creating their own foundation for the project. This article presents a model of open source developer foundations that project leaders can use to compare existing foundations with their needs or to design their own. The model is based on a three-iteration qualitative study involving interviews and supplementary materials review. To demonstrate its usefulness, we apply the model to nine foundations and present their organizational choices in a comparative table format.

References

  1. 1.
    Aldrich, H.E., Bolton, M.K., Baker, T., Sasaki, T.: Information Exchange and Governance Structures in U.S. and Japanese R&D Consortia: Institutional and Organizational Influences. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 45(3), 263 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Apache Software Foundation. How It Works, http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html (accessed December 25, 2011), http://www.webcitation.org/64CSTesol
  3. 3.
    Baker, M.: The State of Mozilla: Sustainability (November 18, 2010), http://www.mozilla.org/foundation/annualreport/2009/sustainability.html (accessed December 25, 2011), http://www.webcitation.org/64CSdMEdU
  4. 4.
    Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Qualitative Research. Sage Publications (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    German, D., Di Penta, M., Davies, J.: Understanding and Auditing the Licensing of Open Source Software Distributions. In: International Conference in Program Comprehension, ICPC 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Open Source Initiative. Open Source Licenses, http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html (accessed December 25, 2011), http://www.webcitation.org/64CSEJk8G
  7. 7.
    Riehle, D.: A New Developer Career (June 10, 2010), http://dirkriehle.com/2010/06/10/linux-tag-keynote-slides-a-new-developer-career (accessed December 25, 2011), http://www.webcitation.org/64CSLWhEV
  8. 8.
    Riehle, D.: The Single-Vendor Commercial Open Source Business Model. Information Systems and e-Business Management 10(1), 5–17 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riehle, D.: The Economic Case for Open Source Foundations. IEEE Computer 43(1), 86–90 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riehle, D.: The Economic Motivation of Open Source: Stakeholder Perspectives. IEEE Computer 40(4), 25–32 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stallman, R.: Why Open Source Misses the Point (September 20, 2011), http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html (accessed December 25, 2011), http://www.webcitation.org/64CRzMBMq
  12. 12.
    West, J., O’Mahoney, S.: The Role of Participation Architectures in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities. Industry and Innovation 15(2) (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xia, M., Zhao, K., Mahoney, J.T.: Enhancing Value via Cooperation: Firms’ Process Benefits From Participation in a Consortium. UIUC College of Business Working Paper 08-0109 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Riehle
    • 1
  • Sebastian Berschneider
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentFriedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations