Analysis of Longitudinal Shape Variability via Subject Specific Growth Modeling

  • James Fishbaugh
  • Marcel Prastawa
  • Stanley Durrleman
  • Joseph Piven
  • Guido Gerig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7510)

Abstract

Statistical analysis of longitudinal imaging data is crucial for understanding normal anatomical development as well as disease progression. This fundamental task is challenging due to the difficulty in modeling longitudinal changes, such as growth, and comparing changes across different populations. We propose a new approach for analyzing shape variability over time, and for quantifying spatiotemporal population differences. Our approach estimates 4D anatomical growth models for a reference population (an average model) and for individuals in different groups. We define a reference 4D space for our analysis as the average population model and measure shape variability through diffeomorphisms that map the reference to the individuals. Conducting our analysis on this 4D space enables straightforward statistical analysis of deformations as they are parameterized by momenta vectors that are located at homologous locations in space and time. We evaluate our method on a synthetic shape database and clinical data from a study that seeks to quantify brain growth differences in infants at risk for autism.

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorder Initial Momentum Geodesic Path Homologous Location Select Time Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Davis, B., Fletcher, P., Bullitt, E., Joshi, S.: Population shape regression from random design data. In: ICCV, pp. 1–7. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Durrleman, S., Pennec, X., Trouvé, A., Gerig, G., Ayache, N.: Spatiotemporal Atlas Estimation for Developmental Delay Detection in Longitudinal Datasets. In: Yang, G.-Z., Hawkes, D., Rueckert, D., Noble, A., Taylor, C. (eds.) MICCAI 2009, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5761, pp. 297–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fishbaugh, J., Durrleman, S., Gerig, G.: Estimation of Smooth Growth Trajectories with Controlled Acceleration from Time Series Shape Data. In: Fichtinger, G., Martel, A., Peters, T. (eds.) MICCAI 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6892, pp. 401–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fletcher, P.: Geodesic Regression on Riemannian Manifolds. In: Pennec, X., Joshi, S., Nielsen, M. (eds.) MICCAI Workshop on Mathematical Foundations of Computational Anatomy, pp. 75–86 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hart, G., Shi, Y., Zhu, H., Sanchez, M., Styner, M., Niethammer, M.: DTI longitudinal atlas construction as an average of growth models. In: Gerig, G., Fletcher, P., Pennec, X. (eds.) MICCAI Workshop on Spatiotemporal Image Analysis for Longitudinal and Time-Series Image Data (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khan, A., Beg, M.: Representation of time-varying shapes in the large deformation diffeomorphic framework. In: ISBI, pp. 1521–1524. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liao, S., Jia, H., Wu, G., Shen, D.: A novel longitudinal atlas construction framework by groupwise registration of subject image sequences. NeuroImage 59(2), 1275–1289 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller, M.I., Trouvé, A., Younes, L.: On the metrics and Euler-Lagrange equations of Computational Anatomy. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 4, 375–405 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Niethammer, M., Huang, Y., Vialard, F.-X.: Geodesic Regression for Image Time-Series. In: Fichtinger, G., Martel, A., Peters, T. (eds.) MICCAI 2011, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6892, pp. 655–662. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vaillant, M., Glaunès, J.: Surface Matching via Currents. In: Christensen, G.E., Sonka, M. (eds.) IPMI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3565, pp. 381–392. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vialard, F., Trouvé, A.: Shape splines and stochastic shape evolutions: A second-order point of view. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 70, 219–251 (2012)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Fishbaugh
    • 1
  • Marcel Prastawa
    • 1
  • Stanley Durrleman
    • 2
  • Joseph Piven
    • 3
  • Guido Gerig
    • 1
  1. 1.Scientific Computing and Imaging InstituteUniversity of UtahUSA
  2. 2.INRIA/ICMPitié Salpêtrière HospitalParisFrance
  3. 3.Carolina Institute for Developmental DisabilitiesUniversity of North CarolinaUSA

Personalised recommendations