Advanced Automatic Mapping from Flat or Hierarchical Metadata Schemas to a Semantic Web Ontology

Requirements, Languages, Tools
  • Justyna Walkowska
  • Marcin Werla
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7489)

Abstract

This paper is dedicated to the issue of automatic mapping from flat or hierarchical metadata schemas to Semantic Web data formats. It proposes a checklist of requirements for such mappings and, based on this checklist, tries to compare functionalities of existing mapping tools. Finally, it introduces jMet2Ont, an open source mapping tool created by PSNC during the SYNAT research project.

Keywords

Metadata Mapping Semantic Web Dublin Core MARC21 CIDOC CRM FRBRoo EDM OWL RDF 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Clark, J. (ed.): XSL Transformations (XSLT). Version 1.0. W3C Recommendation (November 16, 1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt
  2. 2.
    Clayphan, R. (ed.): Europeana Semantic Elements Specification, Version 3.4, http://pro.europeana.eu/technical-requirements
  3. 3.
    Crofts, N., Doerr, M., Gill, T., Stead, S., Stiff, M.: Definition of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model, 5.0.2 edition (June 2005), http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/cidoc_crm_version_5.0.2.pdf
  4. 4.
    Definition of the Europeana Data Model elements, Version 5.2.3, (February 24, 2012), http://pro.europeana.eu/edm-documentation
  5. 5.
    Functional requirements for bibliographic records. Final report, http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf
  6. 6.
    Görz, G., Oischinger, M., Schiemann, B.: An Implementation of the CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (4.2.4) in OWL-DL. In: Proceedings of CIDOC 2008 — The Digital Curation of Cultural Heritage, ICOM CIDOC, Athens (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewandowska, A., Mazurek, C., Werla, M.: Enrichment of European Digital Resources by Federating Regional Digital Libraries in Poland. In: Christensen-Dalsgaard, B., Castelli, D., Ammitzbøll Jurik, B., Lippincott, J. (eds.) ECDL 2008. LNCS, vol. 5173, pp. 256–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MARC 21 Format for Bibliographic. Data Field List 1999 Edition, http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdlist.html
  9. 9.
    Mazurek, C., Sielski, K., Stroiński, M., Walkowska, J., Werla, M., Węglarz, J.: Transforming a Flat Metadata Schema to a Semantic Web Ontology: The Polish Digital Libraries Federation and CIDOC CRM Case Study. In: Bembenik, R., Skonieczny, L., Rybiński, H., Niezgodka, M. (eds.) Intelligent Tools for Building a Scient. Info. Plat. SCI, vol. 390, pp. 153–177. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paluszkiewicz, A.: Format MARC 21 rekordu kartoteki haseł wzorcowych: zastosowanie w Centralnej Kartotece Haseł Wzorcowych NUKAT. In: Nasiłowska, M., Śnieżko, L. (eds.) Wydawnictwo Stowarzyszenia Bibliotekarzy Polskich, Warszawa, Formaty, Kartoteki, vol. 17 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Justyna Walkowska
    • 1
  • Marcin Werla
    • 1
  1. 1.Poznań Supercomputing and Networking CenterPoznańPoland

Personalised recommendations