Joint Use of SCOR and VRM

  • Marite Kirikova
  • Robert Buchmann
  • Razvan Aurelian Costin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 128)

Abstract

Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) and Value Reference Model (VRM) are two popular business process reference models. Practitioners have suggested integrating these frameworks for achieving maximum value from the reference models. However, there are no methods and tools available for the integration of SCOR and VRM. The goal of the research is to find similarities and patterns of differences in the aforementioned reference models. The obtained results are applied to propose blueprint of guidelines for joint use of SCOR and VRM. The paper also presents a comparison between SCOR and VRM from several perspectives, which can support a semantic realignment of processes between the categories proposed by the two management frameworks.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kirchmer, M.: High Performance through Process Excellence. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fettke, P., Loos, P., Zwicker, J.: Business Process Reference Models: Survey and Classification. In: Bussler, C.J., Haller, A. (eds.) BPM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3812, pp. 469–483. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Supply Chain Operations Reference, Supply Chain Council, http://supply-chain.org/scor
  5. 5.
    Brown, G.W.: Value Chains, Value Streams, Value Nets, and Value Delivery Chains, BPTrends (April 2009), http://www.bptrends.com/publicationfiles/FOUR%2004-009-ART-Value%20Chains-Brown.pdf
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Feller, A., Shunk, D., Callarman, T.: Value Chains Versus Supply Chains, http://www.ceibs.edu/knowledge/papers/images/20060317/2847.pdf
  8. 8.
    Harmon, P.: Business Process Change: A Guide for Business Managers and BPM and Six Sigma Professionals, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bolstorff, P., Rosenbaum, R.: Supply Chain Excellence, 3rd edn. AMACOM (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Business process library, Value-Chain Group, http://www.value-chain.org/business-process-library/public/
  11. 11.
    Carrier and Education, Supply Chain Council, http://supply-chain.org/career
  12. 12.
    Value-Chain Group’s and Education and Training, http://www.value-chain.org/educationandtraining/
  13. 13.
    OWL 2 Web Ontology Language, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax
  14. 14.
    ADONIS Community Edition, http://www.adonis-community.com/
  15. 15.
    Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allemang, D., Hendler, J.: Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist. Morgan Kaufmann (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    SPARQL Query Language for RDF, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
  18. 18.
    Open Model Initiative, http://www.openmodels.at
  19. 19.
    Barros, O., Julio, C.: Enterprise and Process Architecture Patterns. Business Process Management Journal 17(4), 598–618 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rabe, M., Jackel, F.-W., Weinaug, H.: Reference Models for Supply Chain Design and Configuration. In: Perrone, L.F., Wieland, F.P., Liu, J., Lawson, B.G., Nicol, D.M., Fujimoto, R.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference, WSC, pp. 1143–1149 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Metastorm Reference Model for Value Chain (VRM), http://www.metastorm.com
  22. 22.
    ARIS SCOR: Do More with SCOR, https://signon.softwareag.com
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Lindemann, M., Junginger, S., Rausch, T., Kühn, H.: ADOLog: An Implementation of the Supply Chain Operations Reference Model. In: Proceedings of the 9th European Concurrent Engineering Conference 2002 (ECEC 2002). Society for Computer Simulation (SCS) (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Junginger, S., Karagiannis, D., Lindemann, M.: Prozessorientiertes Supply-Chain-Design. Industrie Management 18(5), 39–42 (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fill, H.G.: Survey of Existing Visualisation Approaches. In: Visualisation for Semantic Information Systems, pp. 39–159. Springer (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Comvantage project, http://comvantage.eu

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marite Kirikova
    • 1
  • Robert Buchmann
    • 2
  • Razvan Aurelian Costin
    • 3
  1. 1.Dpt. of Systems Theory and DesignRiga Technical UniversityRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer Science, Knowledge Engineering Dpt.University of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Faculty of Economic Sciences and Business Administration, Business Information Systems Dpt.Babes-Bolyai UniversityCluj NapocaRomania

Personalised recommendations