How to Design and Deliver Process Context Sensitive Information: Concept and Prototype

  • Armin Stein
  • Robin Fischer
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 128)


Providing employees with relevant, context-specific information is crucial to achieve productivity and efficiency while executing business processes. Today, tools exist to model various aspects of organizations such as processes, organization structures, services, and their descriptions. However, there still exists a gap between information modeling on a conceptual level and information provision on a runtime level that hinders information dissemination and retrieval while employees execute processes. In daily business life, information workers demand for unstructured content to fulfill well-defined process steps. In this paper, we adapt an existing conceptual approach of process-driven information requirements engineering and present its prototypical implementation based on an industry-developed BPM product. Our solution therefore introduces “information objects” and integrates these with process activities to model the users’ information requirements at process runtime. In doing so, users are empowered to leverage context information such as documents, reports, or emails, while executing human steps in a process.


Information Delivery Business Process Management Process Context Sensitivity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Abecker, A., Bernardi, A., Maus, H., Sintek, M., Wenzel, C.: Information supply for business processes: Coupling workflow with document analysis and information retrieval. Knowledge-Based Systems 13(5), 271–284 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Becker, J., Dreiling, A., Holten, R., Ribbert, M.: Specifying information systems for business process integration – a management perspective. Information Systems and E-Business Management 1(3), 231–263 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Becker, J., Brelage, C., Dreiling, A., Ribbert, M.: Business process-driven information requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Information Resource Management Association Int. Conference, New Orleans, pp. 352–356 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker, J., Kugeler, M., Rosemann, M. (eds.): Process Management: A Guide for the Design of Business Processes. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berthel, J.: Informationsbedarf. In: Handwörterbuch der Organisation, Poeschel, Stuttgart, pp. 872–886 (1992)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brelage, C.: Web Information System Development – Conceptual Modelling of Navigation for Satisfying Information Needs. PhD thesis, University of Münster, Germany (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Earl, M.J.: Information Management. The Organizational Dimension. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fujitsu: Interstage i-flowTMarchitecture white paper (2002),
  9. 9.
    O.M. Group. Metaobject facility (March 2011),
  10. 10.
    Hailpern, B., Tarr, P.: Model-driven development: The good, the bad, and the ugly. IBM Systems Journal 45(3), 451–461 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harmon, P.: Business Process Change – a Manager’s Guide to Improving, Redesigning, and Automating Processes, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heinrich, L.J., Lehner, F.: Informationsmanagement: Planung, Überwachung und Steuerung der Informationsinfrastruktur. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, Oldenbourg (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. Management Information Systems Quarterly 28(1), 75–106 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Höfferer, P.: Achieving business process model interoperability using metamodels and ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), pp. 1620–1631 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krcmar, H.: Informationsmanagement. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laudon, K.C., Laudon, J.P.: Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pyké, J.: BPM in Context: Now and in the Future. In: 2006 Workflow Handbook, pp. 17–28. Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Riebel, P.: Gestaltungsprobleme einer zweckneutralen grundrechnung. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 31, 863–893 (1979)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosemann, M., Recker, J.C., Flender, C., Ansell, P.D.: Understanding context-awareness in business process design. In: Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosenkranz, C., Holten, R.: Combining cybernetics and conceptual modeling: The concept of variety in organizational engineering. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Seoul, pp. 1228–1233 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saidani, O., Nurcan, S.: Towards context aware business process modelling. In: 8th Workshop on Business Process Modeling, Trondheim (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith, H., Fingar, P.: IT Doesn’t Matter – Business Processes Do: A Critical Analysis of Nicholas Carr’s I.T. Article in the Harvard Business Review. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Boston (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strahringer, S.: Metamodellierung als Instrument des Methodenvergleichs: Eine Evaluierung am Beispiel objektorientierter Analysemethoden. PhD thesis, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Aachen (1996)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Szyperski, N.: Informationsbedarf. In: Handwörterbuch der Organisation, Poeschel, pp. 904–913 (1980)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tibco Software Inc. BPM in the federal government,
  26. 26.
    vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.): Handbook on Business Process Management, vol. 1. Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Armin Stein
    • 1
  • Robin Fischer
    • 2
  1. 1.ERCISUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.KIT – Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations