Supporting Educators to Discover and Select ICT Tools with SEEK-AT-WD

  • Adolfo Ruiz-Calleja
  • Guillermo Vega-Gorgojo
  • Areeb Alowisheq
  • Juan Ignacio Asensio-Pérez
  • Thanassis Tiropanis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7563)


Several educational organizations provide Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tool registries to support educators when selecting ICT tools for their classrooms. A common problem is how to populate these registries with descriptions of ICT tools that can be useful for education. This paper proposes to tackle it taking advantage of the information already published in the Web of Data, following a Linked-Data approach. For this purpose, SEEK-AT-WD is proposed as an infrastructure that automatically retrieves ICT tool descriptions from the Web and publishes them back once they are related to an educational vocabulary. A working prototype containing 3556 descriptions of ICT tools is presented. These descriptions can be accessed either from a web interface or through a search client that has also been developed. The potential of the proposal is discussed by means of a feature analysis involving educators, data publishers and registry administrators. Results show that it is much easier to update the data associated to SEEK-AT-WD in comparison to other approaches, while educators obtain from a single registry thousands of tool descriptions collected from the Web.


Educational Organization Tool Registry Computer Support Collaborative Learn Tool Description Automatic Retrieval 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Conole, G., Alevizou, P.: A literature review of the use of Web 2.0 tools in higher education. Technical report, The Open University (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richardson, W.: Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms, 3rd edn. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Madden, A., Ford, N., Miller, D.: Using the Internet in teaching: the views of practitioners (A survey of the views of secondary school teachers in Sheffield, UK). British Journal of Educational Technology 36(2), 255–280 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vega-Gorgojo, G., Bote-Lorenzo, M.L., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Dimitriadis, Y.A., Jorrín-Abellán, I.M.: Semantic search of tools for collaborative learning with the Ontoolsearch system. Computers & Education 54(4), 835–848 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O’Reilly, T.: What is Web 2.0. Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software (2005), (last visited March 2012)
  6. 6.
    Choi, N., Song, I.Y., Han, H.: A survey on ontology mapping. ACM Sigmod Record 35(3), 34–41 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Linked Data - Design Issues (2006), (last visited March 2012)
  8. 8.
    Heath, T., Bizer, C.: Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space, 1st edn. Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology. Morgan & Claypool (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tiropanis, T., Davis, H., Millard, D., Weal, M.: Semantic Technologies for Learning and Teaching in the Web 2.0 Era. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24(6), 49–53 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Auer, S., Bizer, C., Kobilarov, G., Lehmann, J., Cyganiak, R., Ives, Z.G.: DBpedia: A Nucleus for a Web of Open Data. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 722–735. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vega-Gorgojo, G., Bote-Lorenzo, M.L., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Dimitriadis, Y.A., Jorrín-Abellán, I.M.: Ontoolcole: Supporting educators in the semantic search of CSCL tools. Journal of Universal Computer Science (JUCS) 14(1), 27–58 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roman, D., Keller, U., Lausen, H., de Bruijn, J., Lara, R., Stollberg, M., Polleres, A., Feier, C., Bussler, C., Fensel, D.: Web Service Modeling Ontology. Applied Ontology 1(1), 77–106 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin, D., Burstein, M., Hobbs, J., Lassila, O., et al.: OWL-S: Semantic markup for web services. White paper OWL-S 1.1, DARPA Agent Markup Language Program (November 2004), (last visited March 2012)
  14. 14.
    Hartig, O., Langegger, A.: A database perspective on consuming Linked Data on the Web. Datenbank-Spektrum 10(2), 1–10 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    World Wide Web Consortium. SPARQL Query Language for RDF. Recommendation, W3C (2008), (last visited March 2012)
  16. 16.
    Ruiz-Calleja, A., Vega-Gorgojo, G., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Alario-Hoyos, C., Asensio-Pérez, J.I., Bote-Lorenzo, M.L.: Automatic retrieval of educational ICT tool descriptions from the Web of Data. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (in press, 2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kitchenham, B.A.: Evaluating software engineering methods and tools. Parts 1 to 9. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes (1996-1998)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adolfo Ruiz-Calleja
    • 1
  • Guillermo Vega-Gorgojo
    • 1
  • Areeb Alowisheq
    • 2
  • Juan Ignacio Asensio-Pérez
    • 1
  • Thanassis Tiropanis
    • 2
  1. 1.University of ValladolidValladolidSpain
  2. 2.Web and Internet Science GroupUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations