Advertisement

Technological and Organizational Arrangements Sparking Effects on Individual, Community and Organizational Learning

  • Andreas Kaschig
  • Ronald Maier
  • Alexander Sandow
  • Alan Brown
  • Tobias Ley
  • Johannes Magenheim
  • Athanasios Mazarakis
  • Paul Seitlinger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7563)

Abstract

Organizations increasingly recognize the potentials and needs of supporting and guiding the substantial individual and collaborative learning efforts made in the work place. Many interventions have been made into leveraging resources for organizational learning, ultimately aimed at improving effectiveness, innovation and productivity of knowledge work in organizations. However, information is scarce on the effects of such interventions. This paper presents the results of a multiple-case study consisting of seven cases investigating measures organizations have taken in order to spark effects considered beneficial in leveraging resources for organizational learning. We collected a number of reasons why organizations deem themselves as outperforming others in leveraging individual, collaborative and organizational learning, measures that are perceived as successful as well as richly described relationships between those levers and seven selected effects that these measures have caused.

Keywords

Community knowledge maturing knowledge work multiple-case study organizational learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alavi, M., Leidner, D.E.: Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly 25(1), 107–136 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drucker, P.F.: Landmarks of Tomorrow. Harper, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kelloway, E.K., Barling, J.: Knowledge Work as Organizational Behavior. International Journal of Management Reviews 2(3), 287–304 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis, G.B.: Anytime/Anyplace Computing and the Future of Knowledge Work. Communications of the ACM 45(12), 67–73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schultze, U.: On Knowledge Work. In: Holsapple, C.W. (ed.) Handbook on Knowledge Management 1 - Knowledge Matters, pp. 43–58. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Thomas, D.M., Bostrom, R.P., Gouge, M.: Making Knowledge Work in Virtual Teams. Communications of the ACM 50(11), 85–90 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arthur, M.B., DeFillippi, R.J., Lindsay, V.J.: On Being a Knowledge Worker. Organizational Dynamics 37(4), 365–377 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blackler, F.: Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation. Organization Studies 16(6), 1021–1046 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolff, E.: The Growth of Information Workers. Communications of the ACM 48(10), 37–42 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge Creating Company. In: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crossan, M.M., Lane, H.W., White, R.E.: An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. Academy of Management Review 24(3), 522–537 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maier, R., Schmidt, A.: Characterizing Knowledge Maturing: A Conceptual Process Model for Integrating E-Learning and Knowledge Management. In: 4th Conference Professional Knowledge Management (WM 2007). GITO, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eraut, M.: Informal Learning in the Workplace. Studies in Continuing Education 26(2), 247–273 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schön, D.A.: Educating the Reflective Practitioner. In: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. The Jossey-Bass Higher Education Series. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Engeström, Y.: Training for Change. In: New Approach to Instruction and Learning in Working Life, vol. XI, p. 148 S. International Labour Office, Geneva (1994)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Crossan, M.M., Maurer, C.C., White, R.E.: Reflections on the 2009 AMR Decade Award: Do We have a Theory of Organizational Learning? Academy of Management Review 36(3), 446–460 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Learning in doing. Cambridge University Press (1991)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Learning in doing. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wenger, E., White, N., Smith, J.D.: Digital Habitats. In: Stewarding Technology for Communities. Cpsquare, Portland (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nonaka, I., Konno, N.: The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation. California Management Review 40(3), 40–54 (1998)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R.: Institutional Ecology, ’Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science 19(3), 387–420 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barnes, S.-A., et al.: Knowledge Maturing at Workplaces of Knowledge Workers: Results of an Ethnographically Informed Study. In: 9th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW 2009), Graz, Austria (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaschig, A., Maier, R., Sandow, A., Lazoi, M., Barnes, S.-A., Bimrose, J., Bradley, C., Brown, A., Kunzmann, C., Mazarakis, A., Schmidt, A.: Knowledge Maturing Activities and Practices Fostering Organisational Learning: Results of an Empirical Study. In: Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) EC-TEL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6383, pp. 151–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sake, R.E.: Qualitative Case Studies. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research - Design and Methods, 4th edn. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Creswell, J.W.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design, 2nd edn. Choosing Among Five Approaches, vol. XVII, p. 395 S. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Herriott, R.E., Firestone, W.A.: Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizability. Educational Researcher 12(2), 14–19 (1983)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    OECD, EUROSTAT: Oslo Manual - Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edn., p. 162. OECD Publishing (2005)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    O’Dell, C., Grayson, C.J.: If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices. California Mgmt. Review 40(3), 154–174 (1998)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Michailova, S., Husted, K.: Knowledge-Sharing Hostility in Russian Firms. California Management Review 45(3), 59 (2003)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cress, U., Kimmerle, J.: A Systemic and Cognitive View On Collaborative Knowledge Building With Wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 3(2), 105–122 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gee-Woo, B., et al.: Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly 29(1), 87–111 (2005)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, p. 578. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Riege, A.: Three-Dozen Knowledge-Sharing Barriers Managers Must Consider. Journal of Knowledge Management 9(3), 18–35 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Baron, R.A., Gideon, D.M.: Beyond Social Capital: How Social Skills Can Enhance Entrepreneurs’ Success. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005) 14(1), 106–116 (2000)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Inkpen, A.C., Tsang, E.W.K.: Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer. The Academy of Management Review 30(1), 146–165 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Christensen, P.H.: Knowledge sharing: moving away from the obsession with best practices. Journal of Knowledge Management 11(1), 36–47 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working Knowledge. In: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business Research Methods, 2nd edn. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Kaschig
    • 1
  • Ronald Maier
    • 1
  • Alexander Sandow
    • 1
  • Alan Brown
    • 2
  • Tobias Ley
    • 3
  • Johannes Magenheim
    • 4
  • Athanasios Mazarakis
    • 5
  • Paul Seitlinger
    • 6
  1. 1.University of InnsbruckAustria
  2. 2.University of WarwickUnited Kingdom
  3. 3.Tallinn UniversityEstonia
  4. 4.University of PaderbornGermany
  5. 5.FZI Research CenterGermany
  6. 6.Graz University of TechnologyAustria

Personalised recommendations