Advertisement

Towards Automatic Structure Analysis of Digital Musical Content

  • Adrian Simion
  • Ștefan Trăușan-Matu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7557)

Abstract

The intuitive mode of structuring melodies by humans is very hard to reproduce in the context of an automated method. The human brain can differentiate between the pitch, timbre and the attack of a musical note even if the listener doesn’t have prior knowledge of musical theory; the successions of these notes could easily be the base for recognizing various sections of a song. This paper tries to give some insight in the problem of automatic structuring of musical content, by applying some techniques of machine learning. The experiment followed a TOP-DOWN approach by applying the algorithms on 7 different genres, afterwards on one album of a particular genre and in the end on a single audio file of the same genre. After the automatic structure analysis was performed the accuracy of the results was tested by a performance evaluator and by a human component.

Keywords

Machine Learning Automatic structure analysis Data mining and data analysis Neural networks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Besag, J.E.: Nearest-Neighbor Systems and the Auto-Logistic Model for Binary Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 34(1), 75–83 (1972)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bishop, C.M.: Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer Science Business Media (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buddhinath, G., Derry, D.: A Simple Enhancement to One Rule Classification, Department of Computer Science & Software Engineering, University of Melbourne Melbourne, Australia 3010 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cauwemberghs, G., Poggio, T.: Incremental and Decremental Support Vector Machine Learning. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13: Proceedings of the 2000 Conference (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Downie, J.S.: Introduction to Music Information Retrieval Research: Past, Present and Future (2007) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eddy, S.R.: Profile hidden Markov models, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, 4566 Scott Avenue, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. Oxford University Press (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    McCarthy, J., Minsky, L.M., Rochester, N., Shannon, C.E.: A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence (1955)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., Euler, T.: YALE: Rapid Prototyping for Complex Data Mining Tasks. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Montillo, A.A.: Statistical Foundations of Data Analysis, University of Pennsylvania, Radiology Rutgers University, Computer Science (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Murphy, K.P.: Naive Bayes classifiers, Technical Report (2006) Google Scholar
  13. 13.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Simion
    • 1
  • Ștefan Trăușan-Matu
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity “Politehnica” of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations