Evolutionary Approach to Multiobjective Optimization of Portfolios That Reflect the Behaviour of Investment Funds
This paper addresses a problem of finding portfolios that perform better than investment funds while showing similar behaviour. The quality of investment portfolio can be measured using various criteria such as the return and some kind of risk measurement. Investors seek to maximize return while minimizing risk. In order to achieve this goal various instruments are considered. One of the possibilities is to entrust the assets to an investment fund. Investment funds build their own portfolios of stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, etc.
In this paper we consider the problem of finding a portfolio which outperforms a given investment fund with respect to both the return and the risk and which also behaves in a similar way to the given fund. The rationale behind such an approach is that investment strategies of mutual funds are prepared by experts and are therefore expected to be reasonably good in terms of both the return and the risk. To achieve the presented goal we use a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm with a dedicated ”division mutation” operator and a local search procedure. Presented method seems capable of building portfolios with desired qualities.
Keywordsinvestment funds portfolio optimization multiobjective evolutionary optimization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bauer, R.: Genetic Algorithms and Investment Strategies. Wiley, Chichester (1994)Google Scholar
- 2.Best, M.J.: Portfolio Optimization. Chapman & Hall/CRC (2010)Google Scholar
- 3.Deb, K., Agrawal, S., Pratap, A., Meyarivan, T.: A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II. In: Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P., Yao, X. (eds.) PPSN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1917, pp. 849–858. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Dempsey, I., O’Neill, M., Brabazon, A.: Adaptive Trading with Grammatical Evolution. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2006), pp. 2587–2592. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
- 7.Haupt, R.L., Werner, D.H.: Genetic Algorithms in Electromagnetics, pp. 37–38. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Jorion, P.: Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk. McGraw-Hill (2006)Google Scholar
- 10.Li, J., Taiwo, S.: Enhancing Financial Decision Making Using Multi-Objective Financial Genetic Programming. In: Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2171–2178 (2006)Google Scholar
- 11.Lipinski, P.: Dependency Mining in Large Sets of Stock Market Trading Rules. In: Pejas, J., Piegat, A. (eds.) Enhanced Methods in Computer Security, Biometric and Intelligent Systems, pp. 329–336. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2005)Google Scholar
- 15.Michalak, K., Lipinski, P.: Prediction of high increases in stock prices using neural networks. Neural Network World 15(4), 359–366 (2005)Google Scholar
- 16.Radziukyniene, I., Zilinskas, A.: Evolutionary Methods for Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2008, pp. 1155–1159. Newswood Limited (2008)Google Scholar
- 17.Tsang, E., Li, J., Markose, S., Er, H., Salhi, A., Iori, G.: EDDIE in Financial Decision Making. Journal of Management and Economics 4(4) (2000)Google Scholar