Integrating Persistent Surveillance Systems into ISR Architecture

  • Çağatay Soyer
  • Florian Segor
  • Barbara Essendorfer
  • Wilmuth Müller
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 318)


Persistent Surveillance is an increasingly important concept in today’s conflicts due to the asymmetric and complex nature of threats. With the proliferation of Persistent Surveillance Systems, NATO and its nations face a new challenge to integrate these systems into their overall Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) architecture. The same can be observed for the civil security domain. Persistent Surveillance Systems are widely used, but without integrating them into an overall Surveillance and Reconnaissance Architecture. This paper addresses the issue of integrating a Persistent Surveillance System into a standards-based architecture enabling efficient dissemination, search and retrieval. In particular, specific features of Persistent Surveillance Systems and current ISR architectures, potentially causing poor and inefficient integration, are identified. Functional and technical requirements and operating procedures are discussed as potential solutions to prevent these adverse effects. An example system compliant with the NATO ISR Interoperability Architecture (NIIA) is considered to demonstrate applicability and effectiveness of proposed solutions in a perimeter surveillance scenario. The proposed solutions, including the (I)SR Architecture are applicable also in the civil security domain.


Persistent Surveillance ISR Architecture Interoperability 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    NATO Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Interoperability Architecture (NIIA). Allied Engineering Documentation Publication (AEDP)-2. Edition 1 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    STANAG 4609 (Edition 3) – NATO Digital Motion Imagery Standard. Edition 3 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    del Pozo, F., Dymock, A., Feldt, L., Hebrard, P., Sanfelice di Monteforte, F.: Maritime Surveillance in Support of CSDP. In: The Wise Pen Team final report to EDA steering board, European Defence Agency (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    STANAG 4559 (Edition 3) – NATO Standard ISR Library Interface. Edition 3 (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    SOBCAH. Surveillance of Borders, Coastlines and Harbors (2005), doi:
  6. 6.
    Stockfisch, D.: Common Shield 2008. TechDemo 2008/Harbor Protection Trials. Strategie & Technik (October 2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trial Quest. Key NATO Reconnaissance Technology Passes Major Test, doi
  8. 8.
    Ma, Y., Qian, G. (eds.): Intelligent Video Surveillance: Systems and Technology. CRC Press (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Çağatay Soyer
    • 1
  • Florian Segor
    • 2
  • Barbara Essendorfer
    • 2
  • Wilmuth Müller
    • 2
  1. 1.NATO Consultation, Command and Control Agency NC3AThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation IOSBKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations