Advertisement

Safety and Security of Urban Areas through Innovative Architectural and Structural Concepts

  • Norbert Gebbeken
  • Torsten Döge
  • Martin Larcher
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 318)

Abstract

In the past terrorist attacks were increasingly directed against so-called soft targets. Thus, it is necessary to analyze the threats and to protect “public spaces” in urban areas that are primarily not considered permanent critical infrastructure. Specific threats e.g. explosions, vehicle impact and impact of flying debris, arise from various scenarios. Public spaces are to be protected by structural, architectural and land shaping elements that are not recognized as protective elements by the public. This paper describes architectural attractive, art work, and constructional protective measures as well as intelligent design in landscape architecture for the protection of public spaces in urban areas. Overall, the paper deals with a non-standard development and use of physical protective measures.

Keywords

Lightweight Protective Structure Explosions Protective Landscaping Protective curtains 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barakat, M.A., Hetherington, J.G.: New architectural forms to reduce the effects of blast waves and fragments on structures. Structures Under Shock and Impact V, 53–62 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barakat, M.A., Hetherington, J.G.: Architectural approach to reducing blast effects on structures. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings, pp. 333–343 (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barnes, I., Thomas, D.B., Diaper, R.L.: The evaluation of a commercial water tank barrier system for mitigation of explosives fragmentation and blast. In: International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS) 18, Bad Reichenhall (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burger, U.: Impactverhalten von hybriden Verbundwerkstoffen mit metallischem Ringgeflecht. Dissertation, Technische Universität Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chauvin, A., Zerbib, J., Jourdan, G., Daniel, E., Mariani, C., Houas, L., Biamino, L., Tosello, R., Praguine, D.: Investigation of the attenuation of a shock wave passing through a water spray. In: International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS) 21, Jerusalem, (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA 426: Reference Manual to Mitigate Potential Terrorist Attacks Against Buildings. FEMA (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA 430: Site and Urban Design for Security – Guidance Against Potential Terrorist Attacks. FEMA (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gebbeken, N., Döge, T.: Vom Explosionsszenario zur Bemessungslast. Der Prüfingenieur 29, 42–52 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gebbeken, N., Döge, T.: Explosion Protection – Architectural Design, Urban Planning and Landscape Planning. International Journal of Protective Structures 1(1), 1–22 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gebbeken, N., Ruppert, M.: A new material model for concrete in high-dynamic hydrocode simulations. Archive of Applied Mechanics 70, 463–478 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hartmann, T., Pietzsch, A., Gebbeken, N.: A Hydrocode Material Model for Concrete. International Journal of Protective Structures 1(4), 443–468 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Larcher, M., Casadei, F.: Explosions in Complex Geometries - A Comparison of Several Approaches. International Journal of Protective Structures 1(2), 169–196 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larcher, M., Solomos, G., Casadei, F., Gebbeken, N.: Simulation terroristischer Anschläge in Massenverkehrsmitteln. Bautechnik 88(4), 225–232 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Löhner, R., Baum, J.D.: An assessment of architecturally appealing, semi-open shock mitigation devices. In: International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS) 21, Jerusalem (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Löhner, R., Camelli, F., Stück, A.: Adjoint-based design of passive shock mitigation devices. In: International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS) 21, Jerusalem (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mataradze, E., Krauthammer, T., Chikhradze, N., Chagelishvili, E.: Influence of liquid phase concentration on shock wave attenuation in mist. In: International Symposium on Military Aspects of Blast and Shock (MABS) 21, Jerusalem (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, P.D.: Blast walls for structural protection against high explosive threads: a review. International Journal of Protective Structures 1, 67–84 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Teich, M., Gebbeken, N., Larcher, M.: Cable net facades subjected to explosion loads. In: International Symposium on the Application of Architectural Glass. Engineering and architectural design of glass, Munich, Germany (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Norbert Gebbeken
    • 1
  • Torsten Döge
    • 1
  • Martin Larcher
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Engineering Mechanics and Structural MechanicsUniversity of the Bundeswehr MunichGermany

Personalised recommendations