Efficient Negative Selection Algorithms by Sampling and Approximate Counting
Negative selection algorithms (NSAs) are immune-inspired anomaly detection schemes that are trained on normal data only: A set of consistent detectors – i.e., detectors that do not match any element of the training data – is generated by rejection sampling. Then, input elements that are matched by the generated detectors are classified as anomalous. NSAs generally suffer from exponential runtime. Here, we investigate the possibility to accelerate NSAs by sampling directly from the set of consistent detectors. We identify conditions under which this approach yields fully polynomial time randomized approximation schemes of NSAs with exponentially large detector sets. Furthermore, we prove that there exist detector types for which the approach is feasible even though the only other known method for implementing NSAs in polynomial time fails. These results provide a firm theoretical starting point for implementing efficient NSAs based on modern probabilistic techniques like Markov Chain Monte Carlo approaches.
KeywordsPolynomial Time Markov Chain Monte Carlo Detector Type Sample Graph Rejection Sampling
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Forrest, S., Perelson, A.S., Allen, L., Cherukuri, R.: Self-nonself discrimination in a computer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, pp. 202–212. IEEE Computer Society Press (1994)Google Scholar
- 2.Percus, J.K., Percus, O.E., Perelson, A.S.: Predicting the size of the T-cell receptor and antibody combining region from consideration of efficient self-nonself discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90(5), 1691–1695 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Stibor, T.: On the Appropriateness of Negative Selection for Anomaly Detection and Network Intrusion Detection. PhD thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt (2006)Google Scholar
- 9.Liśkiewicz, M., Textor, J.: Negative selection algorithms without generating detectors. In: Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2010), pp. 1047–1054. ACM (2010)Google Scholar