New Combinations of Social Practices in the Knowledge Society

Chapter

Abstract

Paraphrasing the famous quote from Schumpeter, who initially explained innovation as a ‘new combination of production factors’, social innovation can be defined as a new combination of social practices. In order to qualify as social innovations, such combinations or the creation and implementation of absolutely new practices must be intentional, aiming at solving a social issue, and produce effects in terms of novel social facts. Implementation and impact distinguish social innovations from social ideas. Social objectives and rationales, rather than economic ones, make them differentiable from business-driven innovations. However, social innovations take place in business as well as in the public sector and civil society. From a particular sociological point of view, social innovations are becoming of increasing relevance not only because of the frequently mentioned so-called ‘Grand Challenges’ the knowledge society faces in the twenty-first century. On the one hand, re-integration of the most effective economy ever is on the agenda in society, aiming at the ‘management of abundance’. On the other, even the nexus between man-made social systems and human nature may need re-configuration.

Keywords

Civil Society Innovation Process Social Practice Synthetic Biology Knowledge Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aderhold, J. (2010). Probleme mit der Unscheinbarkeit sozialer Innovationen in Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft. In J. Howaldt & H. Jacobsen (Eds.), Soziale Innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma (pp. 109–126). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, D. (1974). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  3. Beniger, J. (1986). The control revolution. Technological and economic origins of the information society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blasy, C., & Gruber, F. (2011). Zur Messbarkeit sozialer Innovationen. In Zentrum für Soziale Innovation (ed.), Pendeln zwischen Wissenschaft und Praxis. ZSI-Beiträge zu sozialen Innovationen (pp. 165–172). Vienna-Berlin: LIT.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Praktische Vernunft. Zur Theorie des Handelns. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Business Panel on Future EU Innovation Policy. (2009). Reinvent Europe through innovation. From a knowledge society to an innovation society. Brussels: DG Enterprise.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (1998). End of millennium. The information age. Economy, society and culture (Vol. 3). Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation. Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Durkheim, E. (1984). Regeln der soziologischen Methode [1895]. Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  10. European Commission. (1995). Green Paper on Innovation. http://europa.eu/documents/comm/green_papers/pdf/com95_688_de.pdf
  11. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020 Flagship Initiative: Innovation Union. http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/innovation-union-communication_en.pdf
  12. Franke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding commercially attractive user innovations. A test of lead user theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibbons, M., et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge. The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, J. (2005). Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  15. Heidenreich, M. (2003). Die Debatte um die Wissensgesellschaft. In Stefan B_schen und Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer (eds.), Wissenschaft in der Wissensgesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Hochgerner, J. (1999). Jenseits der großen Transformation. Arbeit, Technik und Wissen in der Informationsgesellschaft. Vienna: Löcker.Google Scholar
  17. Hochgerner, J. (2009). Innovation processes in the dynamics of social change. In J. Loudin & K. Schuch (Eds.), Innovation cultures. Challenge and learning strategy (pp. 17–45). Prague: Filosofia.Google Scholar
  18. Howaldt, J., & Jacobsen, H. (Eds.). (2010). ‘Soziale Innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma’. Dortmunder Beiträge zur Sozialforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  19. Hubert, A. et al. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: Social innovation in the European Union. BEPA (Bureau of European Policy Advisers) (Ed.), Brussels. Download (1.9.2011) http://ec.europa.eu/bepa/pdf/publications_pdf/social_innovation.pdf.
  20. Hurrelmann, K. (1990). Einführung in die Sozialisationstheorien. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.Google Scholar
  21. Kesselring, A. (2009). Social innovation in private companies. An exploratory empirical study. In S. Roth (Ed.), Non-technological and non-economic innovations. Contributions to a theory of robust innovation. Bern: P. Lang.Google Scholar
  22. Kesselring, A., & Leitner, M. (2008). Soziale Innovation in Unternehmen. Study commissioned by Unruhe Privatstiftung. Vienna: ZSI. https://www.zsi.at/object/publication/1444.
  23. Krippner, G. (2005). The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Economic Review, 3(2), 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Linden, H. (2007). The accidental mind. How brain evolution has given us love, memory, dreams and god. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mensch, G. (1975). Das technologische Patt. Innovationen überwinden die Depression. Frankfurt/M: Fischer.Google Scholar
  26. Meyer, J. (2010). World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. OECD, EUROSTAT. (2005). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  28. Palley, T. (2007). Financialisation. What it is and why it matters. http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/wp_525.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2012.
  29. Parsons, T. (1976). Zur Theorie des Sozialsystems [1951]. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Polanyi, K. (1978). The Great Transformation. Politische und ökonomische Ursprünge von Gesellschaften und Wirtschaftssystemen [1st edition: 1944]. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  31. Radermacher, F. (2010). Die Zukunft unserer Welt. Navigieren in schwierigem Gelände. Essen: Edition Stifterverband.Google Scholar
  32. Reichwald, R., & Piller, F. (2009). Interaktive Wertschöpfung. Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Rosted, J., Kjeldsen, C., & Napier. G. (2009). New nature of innovation. Study report to the OECD Committee for Industry, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (CIIE), jointly funded by the Danish and Finnish governments. Copenhagen: FORA.Google Scholar
  34. Schulmeister, S. (2010). Mitten in der großen Krise. Ein “New Deal”für Europa. Vienna: Picus.Google Scholar
  35. Schumpeter, J. (2005). Kapitalismus, Sozialismus und Demokratie [1st edition: 1942]. Tübingen: UTB.Google Scholar
  36. Schumpeter, J. (2006). Theorie der Wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus [reprint of the 1st edition of 1912]. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  37. Stehr, N. (1994). Knowledge societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Stichweh, R. (2004). On the Genesis of World Society: Innovations and Mechanisms, Luzern: http://www.unilu.ch/files/26stwworldsoc.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2012.
  39. Weber, M. (2005). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft [1st edition: 1922]. Frankfurt/M: Zweitausendeins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zentrum für Soziale InnovationViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations