Advertisement

Social Innovation or Social Exclusion? Innovating Social Services in the Context of a Retrenching Welfare State

  • Flavia MartinelliEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In the last 20 years, publicly provided social services – a pillar of the Post-WW2 welfare states – have experienced significant restructuring throughout Europe. An important stream of research emphasizes the socially innovative impact of many restructuring experiences in specific social services and territorial contexts. In particular, great expectations are placed on the devolution of authority from the central state to local governments, the growing role of the third sector, and the increasing involvement of users, for their positive consequences in terms of response to needs, empowerment and democratic governance. However, these expectations are not fully supported by empirical evidence, some of which highlights how the growing stratification of supply is bringing about inequalities in access and quality, undermining the principle of social citizenship. Innovation in social services may thus involve new forms of social and territorial exclusion. While questioning the mainstream notion of social innovation, the paper argues that a new research agenda should address the challenge of conjugating social innovation with universal social rights and citizenship, through a renewed role for the state.

Keywords

Social Service Welfare State Social Inclusion Universal Access Sector Organisation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, P. (2006). New localism in the English National Health Service: What is it for? Health Policy, 79, 244–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreotti, A. Mingione, E., & Polizzi, E. (2012). Local welfare systems: A challenge for cohesion. Urban Studies 49(9) 1925–40Google Scholar
  3. Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baharopoulou, A., & Siatitsa, D. (2007). Education and training in Greece, WP1.2 Annex E, KATARSIS-FP6 Coordinated Action. http://katarsis.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp1/papers.html.
  5. Bifulco, L., & Vitale, T. (2006). Contracting for welfare services in Italy. Journal of Social Policy, 35(3), 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bifulco, L., & Centemeri, L. (2008). Governance and participation in local welfare: The case of the Italian Piani di Zona. Social Policy & Administration, 42(3), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blomqvist, P. (2004). The choice revolution: Privatization of Swedish welfare services in the 1990s. Social Policy and Administration, 38(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CEC-Commission of the European Communities. (2007). Services of general interest, including social services of general interest: A new European commitment, Document accompanying the Communication on a single market for 21st century Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/services_general_interest/interest_en.htm.
  9. Chambon, J.-L., David, A., & Devevey, J.-M. (1982). Les innovations sociales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  10. Crouch, C., Eder, K., & Tambini, D. (Eds.). (2001). Citizenship, markets and the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. CSI-Challenge Social Innovation (2011). Vienna declaration. http://www.socialinnovation2011.eu/vienna-declaration-2011
  12. De Leonardis, O., & Vitale, T. (2002). Les coopératives sociales et la construction du tiers secteur en Italie. Mouvements, 19, 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. EC-European Commission. (2011). FP7 Cooperation Work Programme: Socio-economic Sciences and Humanities, Brussels: EC. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/cooperation?callIdentifier=FP7-SSH-2012-1.
  14. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Evers, A., Lewis, J., & Riedel, B. (2005). Developing child-care provision in England and Germany: Problems of governance. Journal of European Social Policy, 15(3), 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hubert, A. (2010). Empowering people, driving change: social innovation in the European Union. Brussels: BEPA – Bureau of European Policy Advisers.Google Scholar
  17. Hulgard, L. (2006). Danish social enterprises: A public-third sector partnership. In M. Nyssens (Ed.), Social enterprise at the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society (pp. 50–58). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Hulgard, L., & Spear, R. (2006). Social entrepreneurship and the mobilisation of social capital in European social enterprises. In M. Nyssens (Ed.), Social enterprise at the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society (pp. 85–107). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, C. (2008). Worlds of welfare services and transfers. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. KATARSIS – Growing Inequality and Social Innovation: Alternative Knowledge and Practice in Overcoming Social Exclusion in Europe, FP6 Coordination Action 2006–2009. www.katarsis.ncl.ac.uk/.
  21. Kazepov, Y. (2008). The subsidiarization of social policies: Actors, processes and impacts. European Societies, 10(2), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein, J.-L., & Harrisson, D. (Eds.). (2006). L’innovation sociale. Émergence et effets sur la transformation des sociétés. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
  23. Laville, J.-L., & Nyssens, M. (2000). Solidarity-based third sector organizations in the ‘proximity services’ field: A European Francophone perspective. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacCallum, D., Moulaert, F., Hillier, J., & Vicari Haddock, S. (Eds.). (2009). Social innovation and territorial development. Farnham/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Martinelli, F. (2013). Learning from case studies of social innovation in the field of social services: balancing top-down universalism with bottom-up democracy. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), A handbook of social innovation: Social innovation, collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  26. Moulaert, F. (2009). Social innovation: Institutionally embedded, territorially (re)produced. In D. MacCallum, F. Moulaert, J. Hillier, & S. Vicari Haddock (Eds.), Social innovation and territorial development (pp. 11–23). Ashgate: Farnham and Burlington.Google Scholar
  27. Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (Eds.). (2010). Can neighbourhoods save the city? Community development and social innovation. Oxford/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). A handbook of social innovation: Social innovation, collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  29. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: The Young Foundation and Nesta.Google Scholar
  30. Newman, J., Glendinning, C., & Hughes, M. (2008). Beyond modernisation? Social care and the transformation of welfare governance. Journal of Social Policy, 37(4), 531–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nyssens, M. (2006). Social enterprise at the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services. Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rauch, D. (2008). Central versus local service regulation: Accounting for diverging old-age care developments in Sweden and Denmark, 1980–2000. Social Policy & Administration, 42(3), 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. SINGOCOM – Social Innovation, Governance and Community Building, FP5 2001–2004. http://cordis.europa.eu/documents/documentlibrary/100123951EN6.pdf.
  35. SOCIAL POLIS – Social Platform on Cities and Social Cohesion, FP7 Coordination Action 2007–2010. www.socialpolis.eu/.
  36. Swyngedouw, E., & Jessop, B. (2006). Regulation, reproduction and governance, WP2 Discussion Papers, DEMOLOGOS – Development Models and Logics of Socio-economic Organisation in Space, FP6 – Specific Targeted Project, Contract CIT2-CT-2004-505462, Newcastle, GURU. http://demologos.ncl.ac.uk/wp/wp2/disc.php.
  37. Thompson, S., & Hogget, P. (1996). Universalism, selectivism and particularism. Towards a post-modern social policy. Critical Social Policy, 16(1), 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thorgaard, C., & Vinter, H. (2007). Rescaling social welfare policies in Denmark. National report, Social Policy and Welfare Services Working Papers 10, Copenhagen: The Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
  39. Williams, F. (1992). Somewhere over the rainbow: universality and diversity in social policy. In N. Manning, & R. Page (Eds.), Social Policy Review 4 (pp. 200–19).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mediterranean UniversityReggio CalabriaItaly

Personalised recommendations