Advertisement

Quantified Event Automata: Towards Expressive and Efficient Runtime Monitors

  • Howard Barringer
  • Yliès Falcone
  • Klaus Havelund
  • Giles Reger
  • David Rydeheard
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7436)

Abstract

Runtime verification is the process of checking a property on a trace of events produced by the execution of a computational system. Runtime verification techniques have recently focused on parametric specifications where events take data values as parameters. These techniques exist on a spectrum inhabited by both efficient and expressive techniques. These characteristics are usually shown to be conflicting - in state-of-the-art solutions, efficiency is obtained at the cost of loss of expressiveness and vice-versa. To seek a solution to this conflict we explore a new point on the spectrum by defining an alternative runtime verification approach. We introduce a new formalism for concisely capturing expressive specifications with parameters. Our technique is more expressive than the currently most efficient techniques while at the same time allowing for optimizations.

Keywords

Monitoring State Candidate Selection Ground Event Auction Bidding Runtime Verification 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allan, C., Avgustinov, P., Christensen, A.S., Hendren, L., Kuzins, S., Lhoták, O., de Moor, O., Sereni, D., Sittampalam, G., Tibble, J.: Adding trace matching with free variables to AspectJ. SIGPLAN Not. 40, 345–364 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barringer, H., Goldberg, A., Havelund, K., Sen, K.: Rule-Based Runtime Verification. In: Steffen, B., Levi, G. (eds.) VMCAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 2937, pp. 44–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barringer, H., Groce, A., Havelund, K., Smith, M.: Formal analysis of log files. Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information, and Communication (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barringer, H., Havelund, K.: TraceContract: A Scala DSL for Trace Analysis. In: Butler, M., Schulte, W. (eds.) FM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6664, pp. 57–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barringer, H., Rydeheard, D., Havelund, K.: Rule systems for run-time monitoring: from EAGLE to RuleR. J. Logic Computation 20(3), 675–706 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bauer, A., Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, But How Ugly Is Ugly? In: Sokolsky, O., Taşıran, S. (eds.) RV 2007. LNCS, vol. 4839, pp. 126–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, F., Roşu, G.: Parametric Trace Slicing and Monitoring. In: Kowalewski, S., Philippou, A. (eds.) TACAS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5505, pp. 246–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Falcone, Y., Fernandez, J.-C., Mounier, L.: What can you verify and enforce at runtime? STTT 14(3), 349–382 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Havelund, K., Goldberg, A.: Verify Your Runs. In: Meyer, B., Woodcock, J. (eds.) VSTTE 2005. LNCS, vol. 4171, pp. 374–383. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leucker, M., Schallhart, C.: A brief account of runtime verification. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 78(5), 293–303 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meredith, P., Jin, D., Griffith, D., Chen, F., Roşu, G.: An overview of the MOP runtime verification framework. J. Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 1–41 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Runtime Verification, http://www.runtime-verification.org (2001-2011)
  13. 13.
    Stolz, V.: Temporal assertions with parametrized propositions*. J. Log. and Comput. 20, 743–757 (2010)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stolz, V., Bodden, E.: Temporal assertions using AspectJ. In: Proc. of the 5th Int. Workshop on Runtime Verification (RV 2005). ENTCS, vol. 144(4), pp. 109–124. Elsevier (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stolz, V., Huch, F.: Runtime verification of concurrent Haskell programs. In: Proc. of the 4th Int. Workshop on Runtime Verification (RV 2004). ENTCS, vol. 113, pp. 201–216. Elsevier (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Howard Barringer
    • 1
  • Yliès Falcone
    • 2
  • Klaus Havelund
    • 3
  • Giles Reger
    • 1
  • David Rydeheard
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ManchesterUK
  2. 2.Laboratoire d’Informatique de GrenobleUJF Université Grenoble IFrance
  3. 3.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Inst. of TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations