Linear Logical Voting Protocols
Current approaches to electronic implementations of voting protocols involve translating legal text to source code of an imperative programming language. Because the gap between legal text and source code is very large, it is difficult to trust that the program meets its legal specification. In response, we promote linear logic as a high-level language for both specifying and implementing voting protocols. Our linear logical specifications of the single-winner first-past-the-post (SW-FPTP) and single transferable vote (STV) protocols demonstrate that this approach leads to concise implementations that closely correspond to their legal specification, thereby increasing trust.
KeywordsLogic Programming Linear Logic Legal Text Vote Total Vote Count
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Chang, B.Y.E., Chaudhuri, K., Pfenning, F.: A judgmental analysis of linear logic. Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-03-131R, Carnegie Mellon University (December 2003)Google Scholar
- 6.Clocksin, W.F., Mellish, C.S.: Programming in Prolog, 5th edn. Springer (2003)Google Scholar
- 7.Cochran, D., Kiniry, J.: Vótáil: A formally specified and verified ballot counting system for Irish PR-STV elections. In: Beckert, B., Marché, C. (eds.) Pre-proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Verification of Object-Oriented Software, Paris, France (June 2010)Google Scholar
- 8.Delaune, S., Kremer, S., Ryan, M.: Verifying privacy-type properties of electronic voting protocols. Journal of Computer Security 17(4), 435–487 (2009)Google Scholar
- 9.DeYoung, H., Pfenning, F.: Reasoning about the consequences of authorization policies in a linear epistemic logic. In: Cortier, V., Shmatikov, V. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Foundations of Computer Security, Los Angeles, California (August 2009)Google Scholar
- 13.López, P., Pfenning, F., Polakow, J., Watkins, K.: Monadic concurrent linear logic programming. In: Barahona, P., Felty, A.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 7th International ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, pp. 35–46. ACM Press, Lisbon (2005)Google Scholar
- 16.Watkins, K., Cervesato, I., Pfenning, F., Walker, D.: A concurrent logical framework I: Judgments and properties. Tech. Rep. CMU-CS-02-101, Carnegie Mellon University (2002) (revised May 2003)Google Scholar