Feasibility Analysis of Prêt à Voter for German Federal Elections

  • Denise Demirel
  • Maria Henning
  • Peter Y. A. Ryan
  • Steve Schneider
  • Melanie Volkamer
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32747-6_10

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7187)
Cite this paper as:
Demirel D., Henning M., Ryan P.Y.A., Schneider S., Volkamer M. (2012) Feasibility Analysis of Prêt à Voter for German Federal Elections. In: Kiayias A., Lipmaa H. (eds) E-Voting and Identity. Vote-ID 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7187. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Abstract

Prêt à Voter is one of the most well-known and most extensively analysed electronic voting systems for polling stations. However, an analysis from a legal point of view has not yet been conducted. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the readiness of Prêt à Voter for legally binding federal elections in Germany. This case is of particular interest as Germany has with the Constitutional Court Decision from 2009 probably the most restrictive requirements on electronic voting in particular regarding the public nature of elections and verifiability respectively. While many aspects are analysed, some remain open for further legal and technical discussions. Thus, a final decision is not yet possible. Aspects analysed are the ballot paper layout, different processes from ballot printing through to the publishing of results, as well as verifiability, and the overall election management.

Keywords

Verifiable Elections Legal Requirements German Federal Elections Prêt à Voter Election System Design 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise Demirel
    • 1
  • Maria Henning
    • 2
  • Peter Y. A. Ryan
    • 3
  • Steve Schneider
    • 4
  • Melanie Volkamer
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Security ResearchTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Project Group Constitutionally Compatible Technology Design (provet)Universität KasselGermany
  3. 3.Interdisciplinary Centre for Security and TrustUniversity of LuxembourgLuxembourg
  4. 4.University of SurreyUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations