EGOVIS/EDEM 2012: Advancing Democracy, Government and Governance pp 178-190 | Cite as
A Worked Proposal on eParticipation for State Wide Elections
Abstract
Web 2.0 and, more recently, Social Media, created new forms of social behavior and political engagement. This paper presents a proposal for digital mediation for direct public participation during electoral periods. Mediation is implemented by a web application based on social media principles, iLeger, specifically designed to gather voters and candidates in a shared deliberative space. Interaction and collaboration between these key stakeholders is supported through questions, answers, suggestions, comments, votes and live debates. With this proposal it is intended to contribute to narrow the communication gap between voters and candidates, make campaigns more open and encourage citizens to become involved and participate in electoral debates. This paper includes results of a case study about the Portuguese Parliamentary Elections held in 2011 and conclusions derived from the use of iLeger.
Keywords
Elections Campaigning eDemocracy eParticipation Social MediaPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Sanford, C., Rose, J.: Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management 27, 406–421 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kes-Erkul, A., Erdem Erkul, R.: Web 2.0 in the Process of e-participation: The Case of Organizing for America and the Obama Administration. National Center for Digital Government, Working paper No. 09-001, submitted October 6 (2009)Google Scholar
- 3.Effing, R., van Hillegersberg, J., Huibers, T.: Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 25–35. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bimber, B., Davis, R.: Campaigning Online: The Internet in U.S. Elections. Oxford University Press (2003)Google Scholar
- 5.Sousa, A.A., Agante, P., Gouveia, L.B.: Governmeter: Monitoring Government Performance. A Web Based Application Proposal. In: Andersen, K.N., Francesconi, E., Grönlund, Å., van Engers, T.M. (eds.) EGOVIS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6267, pp. 158–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Sousa, A.A., Agante, P., Gouveia, L.B.: iLeger: A Web Based Application for Participative Elections. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 228–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.SmartVote, http://www.smartvote.ch/ (accessed March 15, 2011)
- 8.CNN ElectionCenter 2008, http://edition.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/ (accessed May 6, 2010)
- 9.Abgeordneten, http://www.abgeordnetenwatch.de/ (accessed May 20, 2010)
- 10.Aggio, C., Marques, J., Sampaio, R.: Campanhas Online, Participação Política e Esfera Pública: O Caso do Plano de Governo Colaborativo nas Eleições Brasileiras de 2010. Public Sphere Reconsidered -Theories and Practices, pp. 3–21. LabCom Books (2011)Google Scholar
- 11.Talbot, D.: How Obama Really Did It: The social-networking strategy that took an obscure senator to the doors of the White House. Technology Review 9/10 (2008)Google Scholar
- 12.Greengard, S.: The First Internet President. Communications of the ACM 52(2), 16–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Wright, S.: Government-run Online Discussion Fora: Moderation, Censorship and the Shadow of Control. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 8(4), 550–568 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Taylor-Smith, E., Lindner, R.: Using Social Networking Tools to Promote eParticipation Initiatives. In: Prosser, A., Parycek, P. (eds.) Proceedings of EDEM 2009 - Conference on Electronic Democracy, Vienna, pp. 115–121 (2009)Google Scholar
- 15.Moreira, A.M., Moller, M., Gerhardt, G., Ladner, A.: E-Society and E-Democracy. In: eGovernment Symposium, Berne, Switzerland (2009)Google Scholar
- 16.Stromer-Galley, J.: On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It. Journal of Communication 50(4), 111–132 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Rosembaum, S.: Curation Nation: How to Win in a World Where Consumers are Creators, 1st edn. McGraw-Hill (2011)Google Scholar