Project Proposals Ranking Based on Closed Sets Properties

  • Sylvia Encheva
  • Sharil Tumin
  • Marina Z. Solesvik
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7467)

Abstract

Cooperative decision making is broadly understood as a consensus process aiming to find the best possible solution for both a particular group as a whole and for its members. While some of the researchers concentrate on the human aspect of the process others work on providing technical solutions facilitating both human and computer based decision makers. Ranking of projects proposals applying closed sets theory is in the main focus of this work. Particular attention is paid to involvement of generators and cover tuples.

Keywords

Cooperative decision making closed sets ranking intelligent systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gratzer, G.: General Lattice Theory. Academic Press, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huylenbroeck, G., Martines, L.: The Average Value Ranking multi-criteria method for project evaluation in regional planning. European Review of Agricultural Economics 19(2), 237–252 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar, S.S.: AHP-based formal system for R&D project evaluation. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 63, 888–896 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Monch, L., Lendermann, P., McGinnis, L.F., Schirrmann, A.: A survey of challenges in modelling and decision-making for discrete event logistics systems. Computers in Industry 62, 557–567 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parsa, S., Parand, F.-A.: Cooperative decision making in a knowledge grid environment. Future Generation Computer Systems 23, 932–938 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pfaltz, J.L.: Establishing Logical Rules from Empirical Data Intern. Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools 17(5), 985–1001 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvia Encheva
    • 1
  • Sharil Tumin
    • 2
  • Marina Z. Solesvik
    • 1
  1. 1.Stord/Haugesund University CollegeHaugesundNorway
  2. 2.IT-Dept.University of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations