Bioinspired Control of Electro-Active Polymers for Next Generation Soft Robots

  • Emma Wilson
  • Sean R. Anderson
  • Tareq Assaf
  • Martin J. Pearson
  • Peter Walters
  • Tony J. Prescott
  • Chris Melhuish
  • Jonathan Rossiter
  • Tony Pipe
  • Paul Dean
  • John Porrill
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7429)

Abstract

The emerging field of soft robotics offers the prospect of replacing existing hard actuator technologies with new soft-smart materials [7]. Such materials have the potential to form a key component of safer, more compliant and light-weight robots. Soft robots constructed from these advanced materials could be used in a progressively wide range of applications, especially those involving interactions between robots and people in unstructured environments such as homes, hospitals and schools. Electroactive polymer (EAP) technologies such as dielectric elastomer (DEA) actuators and ionic polymer-metal composites (IPMCs) are a class of smart materials that are of particular interest for use in soft robotics [2]. However, despite their great potential, EAP devices present a number of challenges for control. They are, for example, non-linear in behaviour, prone to degradation over time, and fabricated with wide tolerances. In this paper we describe a project that aims to develop novel bioinspired control strategies for EAPs addressing these key challenges.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, S., Pearson, M., Pipe, A., Prescott, T., Dean, P., Porrill, J.: Adaptive cancelation of self-generated sensory signals in a whisking robot. IEEE Trans. Robotics 26(6), 1065–1076 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bar-Cohen, Y.: Electroactive polymer (EAP) actuators as artificial muscles: reality, potential, and challenges. Society of Photo Optical (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conn, A., Rossiter, J.: Towards holonomic electro-elastomer actuators with six degrees of freedom. Smart Materials and Structures 21, 035012 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dean, P., Porrill, J., Ekerot, C., Jorntell, H.: The cerebellar microcircuit as an adaptive filter: experimental and computational evidence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(1), 30–43 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lenz, A., Anderson, S., Pipe, A., Melhuish, C., Dean, P., Porrill, J.: Cerebellar-inspired adaptive control of a robot eye actuated by pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics 39(6), 1420–1433 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pearson, M., Pipe, A., Melhuish, C., Mitchinson, B., Prescott, T.: Whiskerbot: a robotic active touch system modeled on the rat whisker sensory system. Adaptive Behavior 15(3), 223–240 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Trivedi, D., Rahn, C., Kier, W., Walker, I.: Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 5(3), 99–117 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma Wilson
    • 1
  • Sean R. Anderson
    • 1
  • Tareq Assaf
    • 2
    • 3
  • Martin J. Pearson
    • 2
    • 3
  • Peter Walters
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tony J. Prescott
    • 1
  • Chris Melhuish
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jonathan Rossiter
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tony Pipe
    • 2
    • 3
  • Paul Dean
    • 1
  • John Porrill
    • 1
  1. 1.Sheffield Centre for Robotics (SCENTRO)University of SheffieldUK
  2. 2.Bristol Robotics Laboratory (BRL)Bristol UniversityUK
  3. 3.University of the West of EnglandUK

Personalised recommendations