Ontology-Based Identification of Research Gaps and Immature Research Areas

  • Kristian Beckers
  • Stefan Eicker
  • Stephan Faßbender
  • Maritta Heisel
  • Holger Schmidt
  • Widura Schwittek
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7465)

Abstract

Researchers often have to understand new knowledge areas, and identify research gaps and immature areas in them. They have to understand and link numerous publications to achieve this goal. This is difficult, because natural language has to be analyzed in the publications, and implicit relations between them have to be discovered. We propose to utilize the structuring possibilities of ontologies to make the relations between publications, knowledge objects (e.g., methods, tools, notations), and knowledge areas explicit. Furthermore, we use Kitchenham’s work on structured literature reviews and apply it to the ontology. We formalize relations between objects in the ontology using Codd’s relational algebra to support different kinds of literature research. These formal expressions are implemented as ontology queries. Thus, we implement an immature research area analysis and research gap identification mechanism. The ontology and its relations are implemented based on the Semantic MediaWiki+ platform.

Keywords

ontologies research gaps knowledge management facetted search 

References

  1. 1.
    Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Technical report, Keele University and NICTA (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kitchenham, B., Charters, S.: Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical Report EBSE 2007-001, Keele University and Durham University Joint Report (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kitchenham, B.A., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S.G., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D.: Refining the systematic literature review process - two participant-observer case studies. Empirical Software Engineering 15(6), 618–653 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S.G.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - a tertiary study. Information & Software Technology 52(8), 792–805 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Brereton, O.P.: Using mapping studies as the basis for further research - a participant-observer case study. Information & Software Technology 53(6), 638–651 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Khalil, M.: Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software 80(4), 571–583 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Budgen, D., Turner, M., Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.: Using Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. In: Proceedings of PPIG 2008, pp. 195–204. Lancaster University (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., Mattsson, M.: Systematic Mapping Studies in Software engineering. In: EASE 2008: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Codd, E.F.: A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Commun. ACM 13(6), 377–387 (1970)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allocca, C., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: DOOR - towards a formalization of ontology relations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development (KEOD), pp. 13–20. INSTICC Press (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Turner, M.: Digital libraries and search engines for software engineering research: An overview. Technical report, Keele University (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Klug, A.: Equivalence of relational algebra and relational calculus query languages having aggregate functions. J. ACM 29(3), 699–717 (1982)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agrawal, R.: Alpha: an extension of relational algebra to express a class of recursive queries. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 14(7), 879–885 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krötzsch, M., Vrandecic, D., Völkel, M., Haller, H., Studer, R.: Semantic wikipedia. J. Web Sem. 5(4), 251–261 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bao, J., Li Ding, J.A.H.: Knowledge representation and query in semantic mediawiki: A formal study. Technical report, Computer Science Department at RPI (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristian Beckers
    • 1
  • Stefan Eicker
    • 1
  • Stephan Faßbender
    • 1
  • Maritta Heisel
    • 1
  • Holger Schmidt
    • 2
  • Widura Schwittek
    • 1
  1. 1.paluno - The Ruhr Institute for Software TechnologyUniversity of Duisburg-EssenGermany
  2. 2.ITESYSInstitut für technische Systeme GmbHGermany

Personalised recommendations