On Guaranteeing Global Dependability Properties in Collaborative Business Process Management

  • Valeria Cardellini
  • Emiliano Casalicchio
  • Vincenzo Grassi
  • Francesco Lo Presti
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7350)

Abstract

The Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) paradigm supports a collaborative business model, where business applications are built from independently developed services, and services and applications build up complex dependencies. Guaranteeing high dependability levels in such complex environment is a key factor for the success of this model. In this chapter we discuss issues concerning the design of such software systems, evidencing the limits of the proposed approaches, and suggesting directions for advancements in this field. Moreover, we also discuss issues concerning the case of self-adaptive SOA systems, whose goal is to self- configure themselves, to cope with changes in the operating conditions and to meet the required dependability with a minimum of resources.

Keywords

Business Process Service Level Agreement Execution Engine Service Choreography Redundancy Scheme 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Activiti: Activiti BPM Platform (2011), http://www.activiti.org/
  3. 3.
    Anisetti, M., Ardagna, C.A., Damiani, E.: Container-Level Security Certification of Services. In: Ardagna, C.A., et al. (eds.) BSME 2012. LNCS, vol. 7350, pp. 93–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Apache Software Foundation: Apache ODE (2011), http://ode.apache.org/
  5. 5.
    Ardagna, D., Pernici, B.: Adaptive service composition in flexible processes. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 33(6), 369–384 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Avizienis, A., Laprie, J.C., Randell, B., Landwehr, C.E.: Basic concepts and taxonomy of dependable and secure computing. IEEE Trans. Dependable Sec. Comput. 1(1), 11–33 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Badr, Y., Peng, Y., Biennier, F.: Digital Ecosystems for Business e-Services in Knowledge-Intensive Firms. In: Ardagna, C.A., et al. (eds.) BSME 2012. LNCS, vol. 7350, pp. 16–31. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baresi, L., Di Nitto, E., Ghezzi, C.: Toward open-world software: Issue and challenges. IEEE Computer 39(10), 36–43 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baresi, L., Guinea, S.: Self-supervising BPEL processes. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 37(2), 247–263 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berbner, R., Spahn, M., Repp, N., Heckmann, O., Steinmetz, R.: Heuristics for QoS-aware Web service composition. In: IEEE ICWS 2006, pp. 72–82 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bonita: Bonita Execution Engine (2011), http://www.bonitasoft.org/
  12. 12.
    Canfora, G., Di Penta, M., Esposito, R., Villani, M.: A framework for QoS-aware binding and re-binding of composite web services. J. Syst. Softw. 81(10), 1754–1769 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cardellini, V., Iannucci, S.: Designing a broker for QoS-driven runtime adaptation of SOA applications. In: IEEE ICWS 2010, pp. 504–511 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cardellini, V., Casalicchio, E., Grassi, V., Iannucci, S., Lo Presti, F., Mirandola, R.: MOSES: a framework for QoS driven runtime adaptation of service-oriented systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. (to appear, 2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cardellini, V., Casalicchio, E., Grassi, V., Lo Presti, F., Mirandola, R.: QoS-driven runtime adaptation of service oriented architectures. In: ACM ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2009, pp. 131–140 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chan, P., Liu, M., Malek, M.: Reliable web services: methodology, experiment and modeling. In: IEEE ICWS 2007, pp. 679–686 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng, B.H.C., Giese, H., Inverardi, P., Magee, J., de Lemos, R.: 08031 – software engineering for self-adaptive systems: A research road map. In: Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems. Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings, vol. 08031. IBFI, Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dan, A., Davis, D., Kearney, R., Keller, A., King, R., Kuebler, D., Ludwig, H., Polan, M., Spreitzer, M., Youssef, A.: Web services on demand: WSLA-driven automated management. IBM Systems J. 43(1) (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Decker, G., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Weske, M.: Interacting services: From specification to execution. Data Knowl. Eng. 68(10), 946–972 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dubois, E., Kubicki, S., Ramel, S., Rifaut, A.: Capturing and Aligning Assurance Requirements for Business Services Systems. In: Ardagna, C.A., et al. (eds.) BSME 2012. LNCS, vol. 7350, pp. 71–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friesen, A., Theilmann, W., Heller, M., Lemcke, J., Momm, C.: On Some Challenges in Business Systems Management and Engineering for the Networked Enterprise of the Future. In: Ardagna, C.A., et al. (eds.) BSME 2012. LNCS, vol. 7350, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guo, H., Huai, J., Li, H., Deng, T., Li, Y., Du, Z.: Angel: Optimal configuration for high available service composition. In: IEEE ICWS 2007, pp. 280–287 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hwang, S.Y., Liao, W.P., Lee, C.H.: Web services selection in support of reliable web service choreography. In: IEEE ICWS 2010, pp. 115–122 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hwang, S.Y., Lim, E.P., Lee, C.H., Chen, C.H.: Dynamic web service selection for reliable web service composition. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 1(2), 104–116 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ko, R., Lee, S., Lee, E.W.: Business Process Management (BPM) standards: a survey. Business Process Management J. 15(5), 744–791 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, G., Muthusamy, V., Jacobsen, H.A.: A distributed service-oriented architecture for business process execution. ACM Trans. Web 4(1), 1–33 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mili, H., Tremblay, G., Jaoude, G.B., Lefebvre, E., Elabed, L., Boussaidi, G.E.: Business process modeling languages: Sorting through the alphabet soup. ACM Comput. Surv. 43(1), 1–56 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Niemöller, J., Freiter, E., Vandikas, K., Quinet, R., Levenshteyn, R., Fikouras, I.: Composition in Heterogeneous Service Networks: Requirements and Solutions. In: Ardagna, C.A., et al. (eds.) BSME 2012. LNCS, vol. 7350, pp. 138–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nitto, E.D., Ghezzi, C., Metzger, A., Papazoglou, M.P., Pohl, K.: A journey to highly dynamic, self-adaptive service-based applications. Autom. Softw. Eng. 15(3-4), 313–341 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    OASIS: Web Services Coordination (WS-Coordination) Version 1.2 (February 2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    OMG: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0 (January 2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/
  32. 32.
    Oracle: BPEL Service Engine (2011), http://www.oracle.com/us/technologies/soa/soa-suite/
  33. 33.
    Papazoglou, M.: Web services and business transaction. World Wide Web: Internet and Web Information Systems 6, 49–91 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: Proc. of 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 46–57. IEEE Computer Society (1977)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Qu, Y., Lin, C., Wang, Y., Shan, Z.: Qos-aware composite service selection in grids. In: GCC 2006, pp. 458–465. IEEE Computer Society (2006)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rodriguez, I.B., Halima, R.B., Drira, K., Chassot, C., Jmaiel, M.: A Graph Grammar-Based Dynamic Reconfiguration for Virtualized Web Service-Based Composite Architectures. In: Ardagna, C.A., et al. (eds.) BSME 2012. LNCS, vol. 7350, pp. 181–196. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Salehie, M., Tahvildari, L.: Self-adaptive software: Landscape and research challenges. ACM Trans. Auton. Adapt. Syst. 4(2), 1–42 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Skene, J., Raimondi, F., Emmerich, W.: Service-level agreements for electronic services. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 36(2), 288–304 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sun, C., el Khoury, E., Aiello, M.: Transaction management in service-oriented systems: Requirements and a proposal. IEEE Trans. Services Computing 4(2), 167–180 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Toktar, E., Pujolle, G., Jamhour, E., Penna, M.C., Fonseca, M.: An XML Model for SLA Definition with Key Indicators. In: Medhi, D., Nogueira, J.M.S., Pfeifer, T., Wu, S.F. (eds.) IPOM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4786, pp. 196–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    W3C: Web Services Choreography Description Language Version 1.0 (November 2005), http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-cdl-10/
  42. 42.
    Wetzstein, B., Karastoyanova, D., Kopp, O., Leymann, F., Zwink, D.: Cross-organizational process monitoring based on service choreographies. In: SAC 2010, pp. 2485–2490. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Weyns, D., Malek, S., Andersson, J.: On decentralized self-adaptation: lessons from the trenches and challenges for the future. In: SEAMS 2010, pp. 84–93. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yoon, Y., Ye, C., Jacobsen, H.A.: A distributed framework for reliable and efficient service choreographies. In: WWW 2011, pp. 785–794. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yu, J., Buyya, R.: Taxonomy of workflow management systems for grid computing. Journal of Grid Computing 3(3-4) (2005)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yu, T., Zhang, Y., Lin, K.J.: Efficient algorithms for Web services selection with end-to-end QoS constraints. ACM Trans. Web 1(1), 1–26 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zeng, L., Benatallah, B., Dumas, M., Kalagnamam, J., Chang, H.: QoS-aware middleware for web services composition. IEEE Trans. Soft. Eng. 30(5) (May 2004)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhao, W.: Design and implementation of a byzantine fault tolerance framework for web services. J. Syst. Softw. 82(6), 1004–1015 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zheng, Z., Lyu, M.R.: A distributed replication strategy evaluation and selection framework for fault tolerant web services. In: IEEE ICWS 2008, pp. 145–152 (2008)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zheng, Z., Lyu, M.R.: A QoS-aware fault tolerant middleware for dependable service composition. In: IEEE/IFIP DSN 2009, pp. 239–248 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valeria Cardellini
    • 1
  • Emiliano Casalicchio
    • 1
  • Vincenzo Grassi
    • 1
  • Francesco Lo Presti
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Informatica, Sistemi e ProduzioneUniversità di Roma “Tor Vergata”RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations