The Enlarged EU in a Globalized World: A Comparative Analysis of Elite and Public Opinion Support for a Common European Foreign Policy

Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

In the context of the debates on the present and future role of the EU in a globalized world, in this chapter we focus on the prospects for a common EU foreign policy as conditioned by the attitudes of elites and public opinion within the enlarged EU. The main objective is to investigate the patterns of support for the European integration project in the area of foreign, defense and security policy. We analyze the data from a cross-national survey among elites and citizens across Europe, and test explanatory models which provide us with valuable information on what factors drive elite and public opinion attitudes on the issue of a common European foreign policy, controlling for the possible difference between new and old EU member states.

Keywords

Member State Public Opinion Foreign Policy Political Elite European Security 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Almond (1950). Knowledge and the position of attitudes to a European foreign policy on the real-to-random continuum. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12(2), 113–137.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, M., & Potter, P. (2008). The relationship between mass media, public opinion and foreign policy: Towards a theoretical synthesis. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 39–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruter, M. (2005). Citizens of Europe? The emergence of a mass European identity. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brummer, K. (2007). Superficial, not substantial: The ambiguity of public support for Europe’s security and defence policy. European Security, 16(2), 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carey, S. (2002). Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration? European Union Politics, 3(4), 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Checkel, J. T., & Katzenstein, P. J. (2009). The politicization of European identities. In J. T. Checkel & P. J. Katzenstein (Eds.), European identity (pp. 1–25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Christin, T., & Trechsel, A. H. (2002). Joining the EU: Explaining public opinion in Switzerland? European Union Politics, 3(4), 415–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Citrin, J., & Sides, J. (2004). More than nationals: how identity choice matters in the new Europe. In R. Herrmann, T. Risse, & M. Brewer (Eds.), Transnational identities: Becoming European in the EU (pp. 161–185). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Conti, N., Cotta, M., & Tavares de Almeida, P. (2011). Perspectives of national elites on European citizenship: A South European view. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Duchesne, S., & Frognier, A. (2008). National and European identifications: A dual relationship. Comparative European Politics, 6(2), 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dyson, K. H. F. (2002). European states and the euro: Europeanization, variation, and convergence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fligstein, N. (2008). Euroclash: The EU, European identity, and the future of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M., & Irondelle, B. (2008, April 2–5). Public opinion and European security and defense policy. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Fuchs, D. (2011). European identity and support for European integration. In F. Cerutti, S. Lucarelli, & V. A. Schmidt (Eds.), Debating political identity and legitimacy in the European Union (pp. 55–75). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Gallina, N. (2008). Political elites in east central Europe: Paving the Way for “negative europeanisation”? Opladen: Budrich UniPress.Google Scholar
  16. Gifford, C. (2008). The making of eurosceptic britain: Identity and economy in a post-imperial state. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  17. Green, D. (2007). The Europeans: Political identity in an emerging polity. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  18. Hix, S., & Høyland, B. K. (2011). The political system of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Holsti, O. R. (1992). Public opinion and foreign policy: Challenges to the almond-Lippmann consensus. Mershon series: Research programs and debates. International Studies Quarterly, 36, 439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hooghe, L. (2003). Europe divided? Elites vs. public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 4(3), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2005). Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 6(4), 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2008). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hughes, J., Sasse, G., & Gordon, C. (2008). How deep is the wider Europe?: elites, Europeanization, and euroscepticism in the CEECs. In A. Szczerbiak & P. A. Taggart (Eds.), Opposing Europe?: The comparative party politics of euroscepticism (pp. 181–207). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ichijo, A., & Spohn, W. (2005). Introduction. In A. Ichijo (Ed.), Entangled identities: Nations and Europe (pp. 1–18). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  25. Ilonszki, G. (2009). National discontent and EU support in central and eastern Europe. Europe-Asia Studies, 61, 1041–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Inglehart, R. (1970). Cognitive mobilization and European identity. Comparative Politics, 3(1), 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Isernia, P., Juhasz, Z., & Rattinger, H. (2002). Foreign policy and the rational public in comparative perspective. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(2), 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karp, J., Banducci, S. A., & Bowler, S. (2003). To know It is to love It? Satisfaction with democracy in the European union. Comparative Political Studies, 36(3), 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kentmen, C. (2010). Bases of support for the EU's common foreign and security policy: Gender, attitudes toward economic integration, and attachment to Europe. International Political Science Review, 31(3), 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kopecky, P., & Mudde, C. (2002). The Two sides of euroscepticism: Party positions on European integration in east central Europe. European Union Politics, 3(3), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kritzinger, S. (2003). The influence of the nation-state on individual support for the European union. European Union Politics, 4(2), 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucarelli, S. (2011). Debating identity and legitimacy in the EU. Concluding remarks. In F. Cerutti, S. Lucarelli, & V. A. Schmidt (Eds.), Debating political identity and legitimacy in the European Union (pp. 193–206). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Lucarelli, S., Cerutti, F., & Schmidt, V. A. (Eds.). (2011). Debating political identity and legitimacy in the European union. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Manigart, P., & Marlier, E. (1993). European public opinion and the future of its security. Armes Forces & Society, 19(3), 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McLaren, L. (2002). Public support for the European union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? Journal of Politics, 64(2), 551–566.Google Scholar
  36. McLaren, L. M. (2006). Identity, interests, and attitudes to European integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Peters, D. (2011). A divided union? Public opinion and the EU’s common foreign, security and defense policy. Norway: RECON Online Working Paper 2011/19.Google Scholar
  38. Risse, T. (2010). A community of Europeans?: transnational identities and public spheres. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Rohrschneider, R., & Loveless, M. (2010). Macro-salience: How economic and political contexts mediate popular evaluations of the democratic deficit in the European Union. The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1029–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rohrschneider, R. (2002). The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 463–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanchez-Cuenca, I. (2000). The political basis of support for European integration. European Union Politics, 1(2), 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schoen, H. (2008). Identity, instrumental self-interest and institutional evaluations: Explaining public opinion on common European policies in foreign affairs and defence. European Union Politics, 9(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Public AdministrationUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations