NOVA Workflow: A Workflow Management Tool Targeting Health Services Delivery

  • Wendy MacCaull
  • Fazle Rabbi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7151)

Abstract

We present the NOVA Workflow tool-suite, a prototype for a process, information and communication management tool to guide and inform real world workflows with special attention to the needs of health services delivery. NOVA Workflow is an innovative workflow management system which integrates formal verification into the software development process. For workflow modeling the tool uses the time Compensable Workflow Modeling Language (CWML T ) which produces reliable and structured workflow models and enhances error handling. The graphical editor of the tool gives a common platform for modeling, verifying and developing software. The SOA based architecture of the workflow engine ensures compliance with industry standards. The tool includes an automated translator to a model checking tool, a monitor to facilitate run-time compliance of (health care) policy, and a user friendly browser to give clinicians a convenient way to view a patient’s information without losing the context. We propose an application of the browser to process diagnosis.

Keywords

Model Check Modeling Language Service Orient Architecture Business Process Execution Language Safety Critical System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    OPENEHR, http://www.openehr.org/home.html (last accessed, July 2011)
  2. 2.
    IBM, BEA, Microsoft, SAP, Siebel. Business process execution language for web services version 1.1 (May 2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    BPEL2PN, http://www2.informatik.hu-berlin.de/top/bpel2pn/ (last accessed, April 2011)
  4. 4.
    Rabbi, F., Mashiyat, A., MacCaull, W.: Model checking workflow monitors and its application to a pain management process. In: Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on Foundations of Health Information Engineering and Systems, FHIES 2011, Johannesburg, South Africa, pp. 110–127 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DiVinE project, http://divine.fi.muni.cz/ (last accessed, October 2011)
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Graphical Editing Framework, http://www.eclipse.org/gef/ (last accessed, April 2011)
  8. 8.
    PROM, http://www.processmining.org/ (last accessed, May 2011)
  9. 9.
    Relational persistence for java and .net, http://hibernate.net/ (last accessed, May 2011)
  10. 10.
    Spring framework, http://www.springsource.org/ (last accessed, May 2011)
  11. 11.
    WSENGINEER, http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/ltsa/eclipse/wsengineer/ (last accessed, July 2011)
  12. 12.
    Agrawal, R., Gunopulos, D., Leymann, F.: Mining Process Models from Workflow Logs. In: Schek, H.-J., Saltor, F., Ramos, I., Alonso, G. (eds.) EDBT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1377, pp. 469–483. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bengtsson, J., Larsen, K.G., Larsson, F., Pettersson, P., Yi, W.: Uppaal — a Tool Suite for Automatic Verification of Real–Time Systems. In: Alur, R., Sontag, E.D., Henzinger, T.A. (eds.) HS 1995. LNCS, vol. 1066, pp. 232–243. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berthomieu, B., Diaz, M.: Modeling and verification of time dependent systems using time Petri nets. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 17, 259–273 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berthomieu, B., Vernadat, F.: Time petri nets analysis with Tina. In: QEST, pp. 123–124 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Broadfield, L., Banerjee, S., Jewers, H., Pollett, A., Simpson, J.: Guidelines for the management of cancer-related pain in adults. Supportive Care Cancer Site Team, Cancer Care Nova Scotia (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Buzan, T.: The Mind Map Book. Penguin Books (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clarke, L.A., Chen, Y., Avrunin, G.S., Chen, B., Cobleigh, R.L., Frederick, K., Henneman, E.A., Osterweil, L.J.: Process programming to support medical safety: A case study on blood transfusion. In: ISPW 2005, pp. 347–359 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Combi, C., Posenato, R.: Controllability in Temporal Conceptual Workflow Schemata. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 64–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Discovering models of software processes from event-based data. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 7, 215–249 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edwards, P.J., Moloney, K.P., Jacko, J.A., Sainfort, F.: Evaluating usability of a commercial electronic health record: A case study. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 66, 718–728 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Evangelista, S., Haddad, S., Pradat-Peyre, J.-F.: Syntactical Colored Petri Nets Reductions. In: Peled, D.A., Tsay, Y.-K. (eds.) ATVA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3707, pp. 202–216. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knuplesch, D., Ly, L.T., Rinderle-Ma, S., Pfeifer, H., Dadam, P.: On Enabling Data-Aware Compliance Checking of Business Process Models. In: Parsons, J., Saeki, M., Shoval, P., Woo, C., Wand, Y. (eds.) ER 2010. LNCS, vol. 6412, pp. 332–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kokash, N., Krause, C., de Vink, E.P.: Time and data-aware analysis of graphical service models in Reo. In: Proceedings of the 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods, SEFM 2010, pp. 125–134. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li, J., Zhu, H., He, J.: Specifying and Verifying Web Transactions. In: Suzuki, K., Higashino, T., Yasumoto, K., El-Fakih, K. (eds.) FORTE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5048, pp. 149–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, W., Fan, Y.: A time management method in workflow management system. In: Grid and Pervasive Computing Conference, pp. 3–10 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mashiyat, A.S., Rabbi, F., MacCaull, W.: Modeling and Verifying Timed Compensable Workflows and an Application to Health Care. In: Salaün, G., Schätz, B. (eds.) FMICS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6959, pp. 244–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Murata, T.: Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE 77(4), 541–580 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rabbi, F.: Design, development and verification of a compensable workflow modeling language. MSc Thesis, St. Francis Xavier University (2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rabbi, F., Wang, H., MacCaull, W.: Compensable WorkFlow Nets. In: Dong, J.S., Zhu, H. (eds.) ICFEM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6447, pp. 122–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reichert, M., Rinderle, S., Kreher, U., Acker, H., Lauer, M., Dadam, P.: ADEPT2 - next generation process management technology. In: Proceedings Fourth Heidelberg Innovation Forum, Aachen, D.punkt Verlag (April 2007)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Simmonds, J., Ben-David, S., Chechik, M.: Guided recovery for web service applications. In: SIGSOFT FSE, pp. 247–256 (2010)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Traonouez, L.-M., Lime, D., Roux, O.: Parametric model-checking of stopwatch petri nets 15(17), 3273–3304 (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    van der Aalst, W., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Declarative workflows: Balancing between flexibility and support. Computer Science - Research and Development 23, 99–113 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: YAWL: yet another workflow language. Information Systems 30(4), 245–275 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., van Dongen, B.F., Herbst, J., Maruster, L., Schimm, G., Weijters, A.J.M.M.: Workflow mining: a survey of issues and approaches. Data Knowl. Eng. 47, 237–267 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wang, H., MacCaull, W.: An efficient explicit-time description method for timed model checking. In: PDMC, pp. 77–91 (2009)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wynn, M.T., Verbeek, H.M.W.E., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D.: Reduction rules for YAWL workflows with cancellation regions and OR-joins. Information and Software Technology 51(6), 1010–1020 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wendy MacCaull
    • 1
  • Fazle Rabbi
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Logic and InformationSt. Francis Xavier UniversityCanada

Personalised recommendations