Advertisement

Models and Algorithms for the Train Unit Assignment Problem

  • Valentina Cacchiani
  • Alberto Caprara
  • Paolo Toth
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7422)

Abstract

Passenger railway systems are highly complex systems requiring the solution of several planning problems that can be analyzed and solved through the application of mathematical models and optimization techniques, which generally lead to an improvement in the performance of the system, and also to a reduction in the time required for solving these problems. The planning process is generally divided into several phases: Line Planning, Train Timetabling, Train Platforming, Rolling Stock Circulation and Crew Planning. In this paper, the Train-Unit Assignment Problem (TUAP), an important NP-hard problem arising in the Rolling Stock Circulation phase, is considered. In TUAP, we are given a set of timetabled trips, each with a required number of passenger seats, and a set of different train units, each having a cost and consisting of a self-contained train with an engine and a set of wagons with a given number of available seats. TUAP calls for the minimum cost assignment of the train units to the trips, possibly combining more than one train unit for a given trip, so as to fulfill the seat requests. Two Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulations of TUAP are presented together with their relaxations. One is the Linear Programming (LP) relaxation of the model and valid inequalities are introduced for strengthening it. The other is based on the Lagrangian approach. Constructive heuristic algorithms, based on the previously considered relaxations, are proposed, and their solutions are improved by applying local search procedures. Extensive computational results on real-world instances are reported, showing the effectiveness of the proposed bounding procedures and heuristic algorithms.

Keywords

train unit assignment rolling stock heuristic algorithm integer linear programming model relaxation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abbink, E., van den Berg, B., Kroon, L., Salomon, M.: Allocation of railway rolling stock for passenger trains. Transportation Science 38(1), 33–41 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alfieri, A., Groot, R., Kroon, L., Schrijver, A.: Efficient circulation of railway rolling stock. Transportation Science 40(3), 378–391 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ben-Khedher, N., Kintanar, J., Queille, C., Stripling, W.: Schedule optimization at sncf: From conception to day of departure. Interfaces, 6–23 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brucker, P., Hurink, J., Rolfes, T.: Routing of railway carriages. Journal of Global Optimization 27(2), 313–332 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bussieck, M.R., Winter, T., Zimmermann, U.T.: Discrete optimization in public rail transport. Mathematical Programming 79(1), 415–444 (1997)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cacchiani, V., Caprara, A., Galli, L., Kroon, L., Maróti, G., Toth, P.: Railway rolling stock planning: Robustness against large disruptions. Transportation Science 46(2), 217–232 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cacchiani, V., Caprara, A., Maróti, G., Toth, P.: On integer polytopes with few nonzero vertices. Research Report DEIS (2009), http://www.or.deis.unibo.it/alberto/smallsupp.pdf
  8. 8.
    Cacchiani, V., Caprara, A., Toth, P.: Solving a real-world train-unit assignment problem. Mathematical Programming 124(1), 207–231 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cacchiani, V., Caprara, A., Toth, P.: A lagrangian heuristic for a train-unit assignment problem. Discrete Applied Mathematics (2011), doi: 10.1016/j.dam.2011.10.035Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Caprara, A.: Almost 20 years of combinatorial optimization for railway planning: from lagrangian relaxation to column generation. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on Algorithmic Approaches for Transportation Modelling, Optimization, and Systems, vol. 14, pp. 1–12. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Caprara, A., Kroon, L., Monaci, M., Peeters, M., Toth, P.: Passenger railway optimization. In: Barnhart, C., Laporte, G. (eds.) Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 12, pp. 129–187 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caprara, A., Kroon, L., Toth, P.: Optimization problems in passenger railway systems. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science 6, 3896–3905 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cordeau, J.F., Desaulniers, G., Lingaya, N., Soumis, F., Desrosiers, J.: Simultaneous locomotive and car assignment at via rail canada. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 35(8), 767–787 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cordeau, J.F., Soumis, F., Desrosiers, J.: Simultaneous assignment of locomotives and cars to passenger trains. Operations Research 49(4), 531–548 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cordeau, J.F., Toth, P., Vigo, D.: A survey of optimization models for train routing and scheduling. Transportation Science 32(4), 380–404 (1998)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Desrosiers, J., Dumas, Y., Solomon, M.M., Soumis, F.: Time constrained routing and scheduling. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science 8, 35–139 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fioole, P.J., Kroon, L., Maróti, G., Schrijver, A.: A rolling stock circulation model for combining and splitting of passenger trains. European Journal of Operational Research 174(2), 1281–1297 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huisman, D., Kroon, L.G., Lentink, R.M., Vromans, M.J.C.M.: Operations research in passenger railway transportation. Statistica Neerlandica 59(4), 467–497 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lingaya, N., Cordeau, J.F., Desaulniers, G., Desrosiers, J., Soumis, F.: Operational car assignment at via rail canada. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 36(9), 755–778 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maróti, G.: Operations research models for railway rolling stock planning. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nielsen, L.K., Kroon, L., Maróti, G.: A rolling horizon approach for disruption management of railway rolling stock. European Journal of Operational Research (2012), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.037
  22. 22.
    Peeters, M., Kroon, L.: Circulation of railway rolling stock: a branch-and-price approach. Computers & Operations Research 35(2), 538–556 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rouillon, S., Desaulniers, G., Soumis, F.: An extended branch-and-bound method for locomotive assignment. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40(5), 404–423 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schrijver, A.: Minimum circulation of railway stock. CWI Quarterly 6(3), 205–217 (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ziarati, K., Soumis, F., Desrosiers, J., Solomon, M.M.: A branch-first, cut-second approach for locomotive assignment. Management Science, 1156–1168 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentina Cacchiani
    • 1
  • Alberto Caprara
    • 1
  • Paolo Toth
    • 1
  1. 1.DEISUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations