The Japanese Particle yo in Declaratives: Relevance, Priority, and Blaming

  • David Y. Oshima
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7258)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel analysis of two central uses – Davis’ (2011) “guide to action” and “correction” uses – of the Japanese discourse particle yo occurring in declarative clauses. Yo with a rising contour instructs to update the modal base for priority modality relativized to the hearer, thereby indicating that the propositional content is relevant to what the hearer should and may do. Yo with a non-rising contour has a function to indicate that the hearer should have recognized the propositional content beforehand. The two uses of yo share the property of being concerned with the hearer’s duties.

Keywords

Common Ground Modal Base Propositional Content Epistemic Modality Clause Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Politeness: Some universals in language usage, Reissue edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  2. Davis, C.: Constraining interpretation: Sentence final particles in Japanese. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts (2011)Google Scholar
  3. Gunlogson, C.: True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. Routledge, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  4. Hasunuma, A.: Shuujoshi yo no danwa kinoo [The discourse functions of the sentence-final particle yo]. In: Ueda, I., Sunakawa, Y., Takami, K., Noda, H., Hasunuma, A. (eds.) Gengo Tankyuu no Ryooiki [Domains of Linguistic Inquiry], pp. 383–395. Daigaku Shorin, Tokyo (1996)Google Scholar
  5. Heim, I.: On the projection problem for presuppositions. In: Barlow, M., Flickinger, D., Wescoat, M.T. (eds.) Proceedings of WCCFL 2, pp. 114–125. Stanford University, Stanford (1983)Google Scholar
  6. Inoue, M.: Moshimoshi, kippu o otosaremashitayo”: Shuujoshi “yo” o tsukau koto no imi [“Excuse me, you dropped your train ticket”: The meaning of the use of the sentence-final particle yo]. Gengo 26(2), 62–71 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. Izuhara, E.: Shuujoshi “yo” “yone” “ne” saikou [A study of ending particles “yo” “yone” “ne”]. The Journal of Aichi Gakuin University: Humanities & Sciences 51(2), 1–15 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. Kinsui, S.: Shuujoshi yo to ne [Sentence-final particles yo and ne]. Gengo 22(4), 118–121 (1993)Google Scholar
  9. Kori, S.: Nihongo no intoneeshon: Kata to kinoo [Intonation in Japanese: Patterns and functions]. In: Kunihiro, T. (ed.) Akusento, Intoneeshon, Rizumu to Poozu [Accent, Intonation, Rythm and Pause], pp. 169–202. Sanseido, Tokyo (1997)Google Scholar
  10. Koyama, T.: Bunmatsushi to bunmatsu intoneeshon [Sentence final particles and sentence final intonation]. In: Onsei Bunpoo Kenkyuukai (ed.) Bunpoo to Onsei [Speech and Grammar], vol. 1, pp. 97–119. Kurosio Publishers, Tokyo (1997)Google Scholar
  11. Kratzer, A.: Modality. In: von Stechow, A., Wunderlich, D. (eds.) Semantik: Ein Internationales Handbuch der Zeitgenössischen Forschung, pp. 651–656. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1991)Google Scholar
  12. McCready, E.: The dynamics of particles. PhD thesis, University of Texas (2005)Google Scholar
  13. McCready, E.: Particles: Dynamics vs. utility. In: Takubo, Y., Kinuhata, T., Grzelak, S., Nagai, K. (eds.) Japanese/Korean Linguistics, vol. 16, pp. 466–481. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2009)Google Scholar
  14. McCready, E.: Varieties of conventional implicature. Semantics and Pragmatics 3(8), 1–57 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. Miyazaki, K., Adachi, T., Noda, H., Takanashi, S.: Modaritii [Modality]. Kurosio Publishers, Tokyo (2002)Google Scholar
  16. Nihongo Kijutsu Bunpoo Kenkyuukai (ed.): Dai 8 bu: Modaritii [Part 8: Modality]. Gendai nihongo bunpoo [Contemporary Japanese grammar], vol. 4. Kurosio Publishers, Tokyo (2003)Google Scholar
  17. Portner, P.: Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15(4), 351–383 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Potts, C.: The logic of conventional impricatures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  19. Potts, C.: The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2), 165–197 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Takubo, Y., Kinsui, S.: Discourse management in terms of mental spaces. Journal of Pragmatics 28(6), 741–758 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tanaka, S., Kubozono, H.: Nihongo no hatsuon kyooshitsu: Riron to renshuu [Introduction to Japanese pronunciation: Theory and practice]. Kurosio Publishers, Tokyo (1999)Google Scholar
  22. Uyeno, T.: Shuujoshi to sono shuuhen [On Japanese sentence particles]. Nihongo Kyooiku 17, 62–77 (1972)Google Scholar
  23. Venditti, J.J.: The J_ToBI model of Japanese intonation. In: Sun-Ah, J. (ed.) Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, pp. 172–200. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Y. Oshima
    • 1
  1. 1.GSIDNagoya UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations