Advertisement

Individual Semiosis in Multi-Agent Systems

  • Wojciech Lorkiewicz
  • Radoslaw Katarzyniak
  • Ryszard Kowalczyk
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7270)

Abstract

Underlying the importance of communication in highly distributed and autonomous systems, i.e., multi-agent systems, such communication should be autonomously managed by the system itself. As such, it should be managed on the individual level of each individual agent, and still result in a general consistent framework of communication. Such an approach, opposite to the centralised and controlled stance, poses additional problems and introduces new challenges for the system design. It is therefore crucial to design and develop agents that could cope with this new tasks and be able to emerge, align and maintain a common framework of communication. This research intends to fill the current gap and investigate the dynamics of the model of individual semiosis, i.e., narrowing the interaction pattern of Language Game Model to a case of a single teaching agent. In particular, the presented research studies both, analytically and using a simulated framework, the dynamics of the alignment process itself, depending on the internal behaviour of the agent, and the dynamics of the observed phase transition in the alignment process in case of deviations from common context settings.

Keywords

Joint Attention Successful Communication Naming Convention Alignment Process Naming Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bloom, P.: How children learn the meanings of words. The MIT Press (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blythe, R.A., Smith, K., Smith, A.D.M.: Learning Times for Large Lexicons Through Cross-Situational Learning. Cognitive Science 34(4), 620–642 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeBeule, J., DeVylder, B., Belpaeme, T.: A cross-situational learning algorithm for damping homonymy in the guessing game. In: Proceedings of ALIFE X. MIT Press (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Droeschel, D., Stckler, J., Holz, D., Behnke, S.: Towards Joint Attention for a Domestic Service Robot Person Awareness and Gesture Recognition using Time-of-Flight Cameras. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Shanghai, China, pp. 1205–1210 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harnad, S.: The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 42(1-3), 335–346 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ito, M., Tani, J.: Joint attention between a humanoid robot and users in imitation game. In: Proc. of the 3rd Int. Conf. on Development and Learning (ICDL 2004), La Jolla, U.S.A. (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaplan, F., Hafner, V.: The Challenges of Joint Attention. Interaction Studies 7, 67–74 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Philosoph in the Flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lorkiewicz, W., Katarzyniak, R.P.: Representing the Meaning of Symbols in Autonomous Agents. In: Intelligent Information and Database Systems, pp. 183–189. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lorkiewicz, W., Kowalczyk, R., Katarzyniak, R., Vo, B.: On Topic Selection Strategies in Multi-Agent Naming Game. In: AAMAS 2011, pp. 499–506 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lorkiewicz, W., Katarzyniak, R., Kowalczyk, R.: Deviating from Common Context in Individual Semiosis in Multi-Agent Systems. In: Wang, Y., Li, T. (eds.) ISKE2011. AISC, vol. 122, pp. 229–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D., Boyes-Braem, P.: Basic objects in natural categories. Cogn. Psychol. 8, 382–439 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saussure, F.: Course in General Linguistics. Open Court Pub. Co. (1986)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Silva, P.R.S., Tadano, K., Lambacher, S.G., Herath, S.: Unsupervised approach to acquire robot joint attention. In: Proc. of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents, pp. 601–606. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Siskind, J.M.: A computational study of cross-situational techniques for learning word-to-meaning mappings. Cognition 61(1-2), 39–91 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith, K., Smith, A.D.M., Blythe, R.A., Vogt, P.: Cross-Situational Learning: A Mathematical Approach. In: Vogt, P., Sugita, Y., Tuci, E., Nehaniv, C.L. (eds.) EELC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4211, pp. 31–44. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, L., Yu, C.: Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition 106, 1558–1568 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith, K., Smith, A.D.M., Blythe, R.A.: Cross-Situational Learning: An Experimental Study of Word-Learning Mechanisms. Cognitive Science 35, 480–498 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Steels, L.: Language as a Complex Adaptive System. In: Schoenauer, M., Deb, K., Rudolph, G., Yao, X., Lutton, E., Merelo, J.J., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN VI. LNCS, pp. 17–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steels, L.: Language Games for Autonomous Robots. IEEE Intelligent Systems (2001)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steels, L.: The Naming Game. The Electricity Journal 11(9), 30–33 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steels, L.: Modeling the Formation of Language in Embodied Agents: Methods and Open Challenges. In: Evolution of Communication and Language in Embodied Agents, pp. 223–233. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Quine, W.V.O.: Word and Object. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1960)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vogt, P.: The emergence of compositional structures in perceptually grounded language games. Artificial Intelligence 167(1-2), 206–242 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vogt, P.: The physical symbol grounding problem. Cognitive Systems Research 3(3), 429–457 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yu, C., Smith, L.B.: Rapid Word Learning under Uncertainty via Cross-Situational Statistics. Psychological Science 18, 414–420 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yurovsky, D., Yu, C.: Mutual Exclusivity in Cross-Situational Statistical Learning. In: Love, B.C., McRae, K., Sloutsky, V.M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 715–720. Cognitive Science Society, Austin (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wojciech Lorkiewicz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Radoslaw Katarzyniak
    • 1
  • Ryszard Kowalczyk
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of InformaticsWroclaw University of TechnologyPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Information and Communication TechnologiesSwinburne University of TechnologyAustralia

Personalised recommendations