Bisociative Knowledge Discovery pp 472-483

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7250)

Bisociative Music Discovery and Recommendation

  • Sebastian Stober
  • Stefan Haun
  • Andreas Nürnberger

Abstract

Surprising a user with unexpected and fortunate recommendations is a key challenge for recommender systems. Motivated by the concept of bisociations, we propose ways to create an environment where such serendipitous recommendations become more likely. As application domain we focus on music recommendation using MusicGalaxy, an adaptive user-interface for exploring music collections. It leverages a non-linear multi-focus distortion technique that adaptively highlights related music tracks in a projection-based collection visualization depending on the current region of interest. While originally developed to alleviate the impact of inevitable projection errors, it can also adapt according to user-preferences. We discuss how using this technique beyond its original purpose can create distortions of the visualization that facilitate bisociative music discovery.

References

  1. 1.
    Baumann, S., Halloran, J.: An ecological approach to multimodal subjective music similarity perception. In: Proc. of 1st Conf. on Interdisc. Musicology, CIM 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Celma, O., Cano, P.: From hits to niches?: or how popular artists can bias music recommendation and discovery. In: Proc. of the 2nd KDD Workshop on Large-Scale Recommender Systems and the Netflix Prize Competition, NETFLIX 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ellis, D.P.W., Whitman, B., Berenzweig, A., Lawrence, S.: The quest for ground truth in musical artist similarity. In: Proc. of 3rd Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gasser, M., Flexer, A.: Fm4 soundpark audio-based music recommendation in everyday use. In: Proc. of the 6th Sound and Music Computing Conference, SMC 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Germer, T., Götzelmann, T., Spindler, M., Strothotte, T.: Springlens: Distributed nonlinear magnifications. In: Eurographics 2006 - Short Papers, pp. 123–126. Eurographics Association, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gossen, T., Nitsche, M., Haun, S., Nürnberger, A.: Data exploration for bisociative knowledge discovery: A brief overview of tools and evaluation methods. In: Berthold, M.R. (ed.) Bisociative Knowledge Discovery. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7250, pp. 287–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goto, M., Goto, T.: Musicream: New music playback interface for streaming, sticking, sorting, and recalling musical pieces. In: Proc. of 6th Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knees, P., Pohle, T., Schedl, M., Widmer, G.: Exploring Music Collections in Virtual Landscapes. IEEE MultiMedia 14(3), 46–54 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Köstler, A.: The Act of Creation. Macmillan (1964)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kötter, T., Thiel, K., Berthold, M.: Domain bridging associations support creativity. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conf. on Computational Creativity (ICCC 2010), Lisbon (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kruskal, J., Wish, M.: Multidimensional scaling. Sage (1986)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lamere, P., Eck, D.: Using 3D visualizations to explore and discover music. In: Proc. of 8th Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2007), pp. 173–174 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lillie, A.S.: Musicbox: Navigating the space of your music. Master’s thesis, MIT (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lloyd, S.: Automatic playlist generation and music library visualisation with timbral similarity measures. Master’s thesis, Queen Mary University of London (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lübbers, D., Jarke, M.: Adaptive multimodal exploration of music collections. In: Proc. of 10th Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Magas, M., Casey, M., Rhodes, C.: mhashup: fast visual music discovery via locality sensitive hashing. In: SIGGRAPH 2008: ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 New Tech Demos, p. 1. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McNee, S.M., Riedl, J., Konstan, J.A.: Making recommendations better: an analytic model for human-recommender interaction. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mörchen, F., Ultsch, A., Nöcker, M., Stamm, C.: Databionic visualization of music collections according to perceptual distance. In: Proc. of 6th Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pampalk, E., Goto, M.: Musicrainbow: A new user interface to discover artists using audio-based similarity and web-based labeling. In: Proc. of 7th Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2006), pp. 367–370 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pampalk, E., Goto, M.: Musicsun: A new approach to artist recommendation. In: Proc. of 8th Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2007), pp. 101–104 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pampalk, E., Rauber, A., Merkl, D.: Content-based organization and visualization of music archives. In: Proc. of ACM MULTIMEDIA 2002 (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Plate, C., Basselin, N., Kröner, A., Schneider, M., Baldes, S., Dimitrova, V., Jameson, A.: Recomindation: New Functions for Augmented Memories. In: Wade, V.P., Ashman, H., Smyth, B. (eds.) AH 2006. LNCS, vol. 4018, pp. 141–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Platt, J.C.: Fast embedding of sparse music similarity graphs. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2003), vol. 16 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sarmento, L., Gouyon, F., Costa, B., Oliveira, E.: Visualizing networks of music artists with rama. In: Int. Conf. on Web Information Systems and Technologies, Lisbon (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Segond, M., Borgelt, C.: Selecting the links in bisoNets generated from document collections. In: Berthold, M.R. (ed.) Bisociative Knowledge Discovery. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7250, pp. 56–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stober, S., Hentschel, C., Nürnberger, A.: Evaluation of adaptive springlens – a multi-focus interface for exploring multimedia collections. In: Proc. of 6th Nordic Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction, NordiCHI 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stober, S., Nürnberger, A.: Towards User-Adaptive Structuring and Organization of Music Collections. In: Detyniecki, M., Leiner, U., Nürnberger, A. (eds.) AMR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5811, pp. 53–65. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stober, S., Nürnberger, A.: A multi-focus zoomable interface for multi-facet exploration of music collections. In: Proc. of 7th Int. Symposium on Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval, CMMR 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stober, S., Nürnberger, A.: MusicGalaxy – an adaptive user-interface for exploratory music retrieval. In: Proc. of 7th Sound and Music Computing Conference, SMC 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stober, S., Nürnberger, A.: Similarity Adaptation in an Exploratory Retrieval Scenario. In: Detyniecki, M., Knees, P., Nürnberger, A., Schedl, M., Stober, S. (eds.) AMR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6817, pp. 144–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Torrens, M., Hertzog, P., Arcos, J.L.: Visualizing and exploring personal music libraries. In: Proc. of 5th Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vignoli, F., Pauws, S.: A music retrieval system based on user driven similarity and its evaluation. In: Proc. of 6th Int. Conf. on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR 2005 (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Stober
    • 1
  • Stefan Haun
    • 1
  • Andreas Nürnberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Data & Knowledge Engineering Group, Faculty of Computer ScienceOtto-von-Guericke-University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations