Time Scales of Sensorimotor Contingencies
In Sensorimotor Contingency Theory (SMCT) differences between the perceptual qualities of sensory modalities are explained by the different structure of dependencies between a human’s actions and the ensuing changes in sensory stimulation. It distinguishes modality-related Sensory-Motor Contingencies (SMCs), that describe the structure of changes for individual sensory modalities, and object-related SMCs, that capture the multisensory patterns caused by actions directed towards objects. These properties suggest a division of time scales in that modality-related SMCs describe the immediate effect of actions on characteristics of the sensory signal, and object-related SMCs account for sequences of actions and sensory observations. We present a computational model of SMCs that implements this distinction and allows to analyze the properties of the different SMC types. The emergence of perceptual capabilities is demonstrated in a locomotive robot controlled by this model that develops an action-based understanding for the size of its confinement without using any distance sensors.
KeywordsSensory Modality Sensory Signal Acceleration Peak Current Consumption Computerize Thought
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Noë, A.: Action in perception. MIT Press (2004)Google Scholar
- 3.Engel, A.: Directive minds: how dynamics shapes cognition. In: Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., Di Paolo, E.A. (eds.) Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science, pp. 219–243. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar
- 6.Bovet, S., Pfeifer, R.: Emergence of delayed reward learning from sensorimotor coordination. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2272–2277 (August 2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Maye, A., Engel, A.: A discrete computational model of sensorimotor contingencies for object perception and control of behavior. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 3810–3815. IEEE (May 2011)Google Scholar
- 9.Pfeifer, R., Scheier, C.: Understanding Intelligence. MIT Press (September 2001)Google Scholar