Developing Text Customisation Functionality Requirements of PDF Reader and Other User Agents

  • Shawn Lawton Henry
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7382)


This paper addresses the text customisation needs of people with low vision, dyslexia, and related conditions that impact reading, including people with declining eyesight due to ageing. It reports on a literature review and an initial study that explores the aspects of text that users customize (e.g., size, colour, leading, linearization/reflow, and more) for reading RTF and PDF documents, in operating system settings, and in web browser settings. It presents the gap between users’ needs and PDF user agent (primarily Adobe Reader) functionality. The existing literature and this exploratory study indicate that with the technology currently available, PDF is not sufficiently accessible to many people with low vision, dyslexia, and related conditions that impact reading. This paper aims to encourage additional text customisation functionality in Adobe Reader; and to encourage more rigorous studies to understand, document, and communicate how to better meet users’ text customisation needs through mainstream user agents.


low vision dyslexia readability adaptability PDF Adobe Reader text customisation accessibility guidelines accessibility standards user agents 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Reading Rights Coalition. The definition of “print disabled”,
  2. 2.
    Hanson, V.: The user experience: designs and adaptations. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Cross-Disciplinary Workshop on Web Accessibility (W4A 2004), pp. 1–11. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tracy, W.: Letters of Credit: A View of Type Design. Gordon Fraser, London (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tinker, M.: Legibility of Print. Ames. Iowa State University Press, Iowa (1963)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carmichael, L., Dearborn, W.F.: Reading and Visual Fatigue. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston (1947)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization. Fact Sheet # 282: Visual Impairment and Blindness. Geneva (2011),
  7. 7.
    Steinmetz, E.: Americans with disabilities: 2002 U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC: (Current Population Reports, P70–107) (2006) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Dyslexia Association. Dyslexia Basics (2008),
  9. 9.
    Poole, A.: Which Are More Legible: Serif or Sans Serif Typefaces? (2008),
  10. 10.
    McCarthy, J., Swierenga, S.: What we know about dyslexia and Web accessibility: a research review. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 9(2), 147–152 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hanson, V., Richards, J.: A web accessibility service: update and findings. In: Proceedings of the 6th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets 2004), pp. 169–176. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dickinson, A., Gregor, P., Newell, A.F.: Ongoing investigation of the ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics can be alleviated using computer techniques. In: Proceedings of the 5fth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, pp. 97–103. ACM Press, Edinburgh (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gregor, P., Dickinson, A., Macaffer, A., Andreasen, P.: SeeWord—a personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. British Journal of Educational Technology 34, 341–355 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gregor, P., Newell, A.: An empirical investigation of ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics may be alleviated using computer techniques. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Assets 2000), pp. 85–91. ACM, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    US Access Board. Section 508 Homepage: Electronic and Information Technology,
  16. 16.
    Santana, V.F., Oliveira, R., Almeida, L.D.A., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Web Accessibility and People with Dyslexia: A Survey on Techniques and Guidelines. In: Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A 2012). ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Calabrèse, A., Bernard, J.B., Hoffart, L., Faure, G., Barouch, F., Conrath, J., Castet, E.: Small effect of interline spacing on maximal reading speed in low-vision patients with central field loss irrespective of scotoma size. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51(2), 1247–1254 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hartley, J.: What does it say? Text design, medical information, and older readers. In: Park, D.C., Morrell, R.W., Shifren, K. (eds.) Processing of Medical Information in Aging Patients, pp. 233–248. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bix, L.: The Elements of Text and Message Design and Their Impact on Message Legibility: A Literature Review. Journal of Design Communication (4) (2002),
  20. 20.
    Kitchel, J.E. APH Guidelines for Print Document Design,
  21. 21.
    Arditi, A.: Making Text Legible: Designing for People with Partial Sight. Lighthouse International, New York (1999, 2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    CCLVI. Best Practices and Guidelines for Large Print Documents used by the Low Vision Community,
  24. 24.
    Morrell, R.W., Dailey, S.R., Feldman, C., Mayhorn, C.G., Echt, K.V.: Older adults and information technology: A compendium of scientific research and Web site ac-cessibility guidelines. National Institute on Aging, Bethesda (2002)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    The Center for the Partially Sighted. Print Guidelines,
  26. 26.
    Holt, B.: Creating Senior-Friendly Web Sites. Center For Medicare Education Issue Brief 1(4), 1–8 (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rainger, P.: A Dyslexic Perspective on e-Content Accessibility. JISC TechDis. (2003),
  28. 28.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shawn Lawton Henry

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations