Following the WCAG 2.0 Techniques: Experiences from Designing a WCAG 2.0 Checking Tool

  • Annika Nietzio
  • Mandana Eibegger
  • Morten Goodwin
  • Mikael Snaprud
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7382)

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual analysis of how the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 and its accompanying documents can be used as a basis for the implementation of an automatic checking tool and the definition of a web accessibility metric. There are two major issues that need to be resolved to derive valid and reliable conclusions from the output of individual tests. First, the relationship of Sufficient Techniques and Common Failures has to be taken into account. Second, the logical combination of the techniques related to a Success Criterion must be represented in the results.

The eGovMon project has a lot of experience in specifying and implementing tools for automatic checking of web accessibility. The project is based on the belief that web accessibility evaluation is not an end in itself. Its purpose is to promote web accessibility and initiate improvements.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    ACCESSIBLE Project: Web accessibility assessment Tool (WaaT) (2011), http://www.accessible-project.eu/ (retrieved January 30, 2012)
  2. 2.
    Alonso, F., Fuertes, J.L., González, Á.L., Martínez, L.: Evaluating Conformance to WCAG 2.0: Open Challenges. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6179, pp. 417–424. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Battistelli, M., Mirri, S., Muratori, L.A., Salomoni, P.: Measuring accessibility barriers on large scale sets of pages. In: Proceedings of W3C Online Symposium on Website Accessibility Metrics (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nietzio, A., Eibegger, M., Goodwin, M., Snaprud, M.: Towards a score function for WCAG 2.0 benchmarking. In: Proceedings of W3C Online Symposium on Website Accessibility Metrics (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vigo, M., Abascal, J., Aizpurua, A., Arrue, M.: Attaining Metric Validity and Reliability with the Web Accessibility Quantitative Metric. In: Proceedings of W3C Online Symposium on Website Accessibility Metrics (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vigo, M., Brajnik, G.: Automatic web accessibility metrics: where we are and where we can go. Interacting with Computers 23(2), 137–155 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Web Accessibility Benchmarking Cluster: Unified Web Evaluation Methodology (UWEM 1.2) (2007), http://www.wabcluster.org/uwem1_2/ (retrieved January 30, 2012)
  8. 8.
    World Wide Web Consortium: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. W3C Recommendation (May 5, 1999), http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/ (retrieved April 17, 2012)
  9. 9.
    World Wide Web Consortium: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. W3C Recommendation (December 11, 2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ (retrieved January 30, 2012)
  10. 10.
    World Wide Web Consortium: A guide to understanding and implementing Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. W3C Working Group Note (January 3, 2012), http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20120103/ (retrieved January 31, 2012)
  11. 11.
    World Wide Web Consortium: Techniques and Failures for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. W3C Working Group Note (January 3, 2012), http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-WCAG20-TECHS-20120103/ (retrieved January 31, 2012)
  12. 12.
    Zeng, X.: Evaluation and Enhancement of Web Content Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annika Nietzio
    • 1
  • Mandana Eibegger
    • 2
  • Morten Goodwin
    • 2
  • Mikael Snaprud
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Forschungsinstitut Technologie und Behinderung (FTB), der Evangelischen Stiftung VolmarsteinWetter (Ruhr)Germany
  2. 2.Tingtun ASLillesandNorway
  3. 3.University of AgderGrimstadNorway

Personalised recommendations