Advertisement

RHYME: Musicking for All

  • Harald Holone
  • Jo Herstad
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7382)

Abstract

This paper describes the RHYME project, aimed at children with multiple disabilities, their families and caregivers. The goal in this cross disciplinary project is to create and evaluate platforms for co-creation through music and physical interaction in order to improve health and well being for the participants. The paper has two main contributions: 1) a review and discussion of Participatory Design in Design for All, and 2) Tangible Interaction and familiarity as a basis for the possibility of musicking for all, for children, their families and caregivers, on individual terms.

Keywords

Music Therapy Participatory Design Agile Method Multiple Disability Tangible Interaction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bødker, S.: When second wave hci meets third wave challenges. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction: Changing Roles, pp. 1–8. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cappelen, B., Andersson, A.P.: Designing smart textiles for music and health. In: Ambience 2011: Were Art Technology and Design Meet. University of Borås, Borås (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cappelen, B., Andersson, A.P.: Expanding the role of the instrument. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Challis, B.P., Challis, K.: Applications for Proximity Sensors in Music and Sound Performance. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 1220–1227. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Challis, B.P., Edwards, A.D.N.: Weasel: A system for the non-visual presentation of music notation. In: Proceedings of ICCHP, pp. 113–120. Citeseer (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cremers, A.H.M., de Jong, J.G.M., van Balken, J.S.: User-Centered Design with Illiterate Persons: The Case of the ATM User Interface. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 713–720. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crombie, D., Dijkstra, S.J., Schut, E., Lindsay, N.: Spoken Music: Enhancing Access to Music for the Print Disabled. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W. (eds.) ICCHP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2398, pp. 667–674. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Crombie, D., Lenoir, R., McKenzie, N.R., Challis, B.P.: Making Music Accessible. Introduction to the Special Thematic Session. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Burger, D. (eds.) ICCHP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3118, pp. 214–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Darrow, A.-A.: Adaptive instruments for students with physical disabilities. General Music Today 25(2), 44–46 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Demirbilek, O., Demirkan, H.: Universal product design involving elderly users: a participatory design model. Applied Ergonomics 35(4), 361–370 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dourish, P.: What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8(1), 19–30 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fallman, D.: The new good: exploring the potential of philosophy of technology to contribute to human-computer interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1051–1060. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer, G.: Communities of Interest: Learning through the Interaction of Multiple Knowledge Systems. In: 24th Annual Information Systems Research Seminar In Scandinavia (IRIS 24), Ulvik, Norway, pp. 1–14 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gaver, W.W., Beaver, J., Benford, S.: Ambiguity as a resource for design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 233–240. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hornecker, E., Buur, J.: Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 437–446. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ishii, H.: Tangible bits: beyond pixels. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pp. xv–xxv. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kortuem, G., Kawsar, F., Fitton, D., Sundramoorthy, V.: Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things. IEEE Internet Computing 14(1), 44–51 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Magee, W.L., Burland, K.: An exploratory study of the use of electronic music technologies in clinical music therapy. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy 17(2), 124–141 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McKenzie, N.R., Marwick-Johnstone, B.: Making the I-Maestro Music Learning Framework Accessible. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 770–776. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Memmel, T., Reiterer, H., Holzinger, A.: Agile Methods and Visual Specification in Software Development: A Chance to Ensure Universal Access. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 453–462. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moffatt, K., McGrenere, J., Purves, B., Klawe, M.: The participatory design of a sound and image enhanced daily planner for people with aphasia. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 407–414. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Okamoto, M., Komatsu, H., Gyobu, I., Ito, K.: Participatory design using scenarios in different cultures. In: Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Design and Usability, pp. 223–231 (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Small, C.: Musicking the meanings of performing and listening. A lecture. Music Education Research 1(1), 9–22 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stensæth, K., Ruud, E.: Musikkmøbler eller musikkinstrumenter? om forskningsprosjektet rhyme og interaktiv digital helseteknologi i musikkterapien. Musikkterapi (forthcoming, 2012)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tollefsen, M., Flyen, A.: Internet and Accessible Entertainment. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4061, pp. 396–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tollefsen, M., Flyen, A.: Flexible and Simple User Interfaces in Entertaining Software. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A.I. (eds.) ICCHP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5105, pp. 578–584. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Turner, P., Walle, G.: Familiarity as a basis for universal design. Gerontechnology 5(3), 150–159 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    World Blind Union, Krolick, B.: New international manual of Braille music notation. SVB (1996)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 265(3), 94–104 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolf, W.: What is embedded computing? Computer 35(1), 136–137 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harald Holone
    • 1
  • Jo Herstad
    • 2
  1. 1.Østfold University CollegeHaldenNorway
  2. 2.University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations