Advertisement

On-the-Fly Emendation of Multi-level Models

  • Colin Atkinson
  • Ralph Gerbig
  • Bastian Kennel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7349)

Abstract

One of the main advantages of multi-level modeling environments over traditional modeling environments is that all ontological classification levels are treated in a uniform way and are all equally available for immediate, on-the-fly modification. However, such flexibility is a two-edged sword, since a minor change in a (meta-) ontological level can have a dramatic impact on other parts of the ontology (i.e. collection of ontological levels) - requiring a large number of “knock-on” changes to keep the overall ontology correct. To effectively exploit the modeling flexibility offered by multi-level modeling environments therefore, modelers need semi-automated support for emending ontologies to keep them consistent in the face of changes. In this paper we describe a model emendation architecture and illustrate how it can help modelers maintain the correctness of an ontology.

Keywords

multi-level emendation orthogonal classification architecture ontological classification linguistic classification 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atkinson, C., Gutheil, M., Kennel, B.: A Flexible Infrastructure for Multilevel Language Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Basler, M., Brydon, S., Nourie, D., Singh, I.: Introducing the Java Pet Store 2.0 Application (2007), http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2EE/petstore/
  3. 3.
    Brosch, P., Seidl, M., Wieland, K., Wimmer, M., Langer, P.: The operation recorder: specifying model refactorings by-example. In: OOPSLA Companion, pp. 791–792 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eclipse Foundation: Edapt (2012), http://www.eclipse.org/edapt/
  5. 5.
    Fowler, M.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kennel, B.: A Unified Framework for Multi-Level Modeling. Ph.D. thesis, University Mannheim (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klein, M., Noy, N.F.: A component-based framework for ontology evolution. In: Workshop on Ontologies and Distributed Systems at IJCAI 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kleppe, A.: Software Language Engineering: Creating Domain-specific Languages Using Metamodels. Addison-Wesley (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maynard, D., Peters, W., Sabou, M., dÁquin, M.: Change management for metadata evolution. In: International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD) ESWC 2007 Workshop (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miriam-Webster: Definition of Emendation (2012), http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/emendation
  11. 11.
    Opdyke, W.F.: Refactoring object-oriented frameworks. Ph.D. thesis, Champaign, IL, USA, uMI Order No. GAX93-05645 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reimann, J., Seifert, M., Aßmann, U.: Role-Based Generic Model Refactoring. In: Petriu, D.C., Rouquette, N., Haugen, Ø. (eds.) MODELS 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6395, pp. 78–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    University of Mannheim - Software Engineering Group: MelaniE - Multi-level modeling and ontology engineering Environment (2012), http://www.eclipselabs.org/p/melanie

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin Atkinson
    • 1
  • Ralph Gerbig
    • 1
  • Bastian Kennel
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations