Inquisitive Knowledge Attribution and the Gettier Problem
A disjunctive belief cannot be described as knowledge if the subject does not justifiably believe a true disjunct, even if the whole disjunctive belief is true and justified (Gettier 1963). This phenomenon is problematic if the verb know semantically operates on a (classical) proposition, as standardly assumed. In this paper, I offer a solution to this problem using Inquisitive Semantics, arguing that know operates on the set of alternative possibilities expressed by its complement. It will also be shown that the proposed semantics for know provides a novel account of its compatibility with both declarative and interrogative complements.
Keywordsdisjunction know-that know-wh attitude verb question-embedding Gettier problem Inquisitive Semantics Alternative Semantics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Alonso-Ovalle, L.: Disjunction in Alternative Semantics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst (2006)Google Scholar
- Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Information, issues, and attention. Ms., ILLC, University of Amsterdam (2010)Google Scholar
- Ginzburg, J.: Resolving questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 18(5), 459–527 (Part I) and 567–609 (Part II) (1995)Google Scholar
- Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. In: Larrazabal, J.M., Zubeldia, L. (eds.) Meaning, Content, and Argument: Proceedings of the ILCLI International Workshop on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Rhetoric (2009)Google Scholar
- Groenendijk, J., Stokhof, M.: Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. Ph.D. thesis. University of Amsterdam (1984)Google Scholar
- Kratzer, A., Shimoyama, J.: Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In: Otsu, Y. (ed.) The Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, pp. 1–25. Hituji Shobo, Tokyo (2002)Google Scholar
- Steup, M.: The analysis of knowledge. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The Metaphysics Research Lab and CSLI (2009)Google Scholar