Now: A Discourse-Based Theory

  • Julie Hunter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7218)

Abstract

This paper offers a semantic theory of uses of now in which now refers to a time introduced in discourse. I argue that the interpretation of an anaphoric use of now is determined by the rhetorical structure of the discourse in which the token of now figures.

Keywords

anaphora now rhetorical structure discourse structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afantenos, S., et al.: An empirical resource for discovering cognitive principles of discourse organization: the ANNODIS corpus. In: Proceedings of LREC 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Asher, N., Lascarides, A.: The Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press (2003)Google Scholar
  3. Banfield, A.: Unspeakable Sentences: Narration and Representation in the Language of Fiction. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1982)Google Scholar
  4. Hunter, J.: Presuppositional Indexicals. Ph.D. thesis, The University of Texas (2010)Google Scholar
  5. Hunter, J., Asher, N.: A presuppositional account of indexicals. In: Dekker, P., Franke, M. (eds.) The Proceedings of the 15th Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 119–124 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. Kamp, H.: Formal properties of now. Theoria 37, 227–273 (1971)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kamp, H., Reyle, U.: From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1993)Google Scholar
  8. Kaplan, D.: Demonstratives. In: Almog, J., Perry, J., Wettstein, H. (eds.) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, USA (1989)Google Scholar
  9. Lee, E., Choi, J.: Two nows in korean. Journal of Semantics 26 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. Maier, E.: Proper names and indexicals trigger rigid presuppositions. Journal of Semantics 23, 253–315 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Predelli, S.: Utterance, interpretation and the logic of indexicals. Mind & Language 13(3), 400–414 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Recanati, F.: Indexicality and context shift. Harvard University (2004) (manuscript)Google Scholar
  13. Roberts, C.: Demonstratives as definites. In: van Deemter, K., Kibble, R. (eds.) Information Sharing. CSLI Press (2002)Google Scholar
  14. Rooth, M.: A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. van der Sandt, R.: Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9, 333–377 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schlenker, P.: Context of thought and context of utterance. Mind & Language 19(3), 279–304 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zeevat, H.: Demonstratives in discourse. Journal of Semantics 16, 279–313 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Hunter
    • 1
  1. 1.l’Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour and, l’EHESS/l’Institut Jean-NicodParisFrance

Personalised recommendations