Adjectives as Saturators vs. Modifiers: Statistical Evidence

  • Gemma Boleda
  • Stefan Evert
  • Berit Gehrke
  • Louise McNally
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7218)

Abstract

This paper reports on a large-scale, statistical analysis of corpus data to support the null hypothesis that ethnic adjectives (EAs, e.g. French) are ordinary adjectives, rather than argument-saturating “nouns in disguise” (in, e.g., French agreement). In particular, EAs are argued to simply modify the noun they combine with; their special properties in inducing argument-like behavior arises from the interaction between the semantics of event nominals and that of the adjective.

Keywords

adjective argument structure kind modifier modification nominalization lexical semantics logistic regression model statistical analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alexiadou, A., Stavrou, M.: Ethnic adjectivs as pseudo-adjectives: A case study in syntax-morphology interaction and the structure of DP. Studia Linguistica 65, 1–30 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Álvez, J., Atserias, J., Carrera, J., Climent, S., Laparra, E., Oliver, A., Rigau, G.: Complete and consistent annotation of WordNet using the Top Concept Ontology. In: Proceedings of 6th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2008), Marrakech, Morocco (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arsenijević, B., Boleda, G., Gehrke, B., McNally, L.: Ethnic adjectives are proper adjectives. In: Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society 46 (to appear)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baayen, R.H.: Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berndt, D., Boleda, G., Gehrke, B., McNally, L.: Semantic factors in the choice between ethnic adjectives and PP counterparts: Quantitative evidence. Paper presented at QITL-4, Berlin (March 2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bosque, I., Picallo, C.: Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of Linguistics 32, 349–386 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., Baayen, R.H.: Predicting the dative alternation. In: Bouma, G., Krämer, I., Zwarts, J. (eds.) Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, pp. 69–94. Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carlson, G.N.: Reference to Kinds in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst (1977)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evert, S.: The Statistics of Word Cooccurrences: Word Pairs and Collocations. Dissertation, Institut für maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, University of Stuttgart (2004); (published in 2005), urn:nbn:de:bsz:93-opus-23714Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fábregas, A.: The internal syntactic structure of relational adjectives. Probus 19(1), 135–170 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gehrke, B., McNally, L.: Frequency adjectives and assertions about event types. In: Proceedings of SALT 19, pp. 180–197. CLC Publications, Ithaca (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grimshaw, J.: Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harrell, F.: Regression Modeling Strategies. Springer, Berlin (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harrell, F.: rms: Regression Modeling Strategies (2011), http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rms, r package version 3.3-2
  15. 15.
    Johnson, M.: Trading recall for precision with confidence sets (2001) (unpublished technical report)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kayne, R.: On certain differences between French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 12, 349–371 (1981)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McNally, L., Boleda, G.: Relational adjectives as properties of kinds. In: Bonami, O., Hofherr, P.C. (eds.) Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, vol. 5, pp. 179–196 (2004), http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss5
  18. 18.
    Postal, P.: Anaphoric islands. In: Binnick, R.I. (ed.) Proceedings of the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 205–239. University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics, Chicago (1969)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gemma Boleda
    • 1
  • Stefan Evert
    • 2
  • Berit Gehrke
    • 1
  • Louise McNally
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitat Pompeu FabraBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations