Adapting Performance Feedback to a Learner’s Conscientiousness

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7379)


To keep a learner motivated, an intelligent tutoring system may need to adapt its feedback to the learner’s characteristics. We are particularly interested in adaptation of performance feedback to the learner’s personality. Following on from an earlier study that investigated the effect of generalized self-efficacy, this study examines how feedback may need to be adapted to the trait Conscientiousness from the Five Factor Model. We used a User-as-Wizard approach, with participants taking the role of the adaptive feedback generator. Participants were presented with a fictional student with a validated polarized level of Conscientiousness, along with a set of marks the student had achieved in a test. They provided feedback to the learner in the form of a short statement. We examined the level to which participants bent the truth as adaptation to the learner’s conscientiousness. The study suggests that adaptation to conscientiousness may be needed: using a positive slant for highly conscientious students with failing grades.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Deci, E., Ryan, R.: The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 39–74 (1981)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandura, A.: Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cianci, A., Klein, H., Sejits, G.: The effect of negative feedback on tension and subsequent performance: The main and interactive effect of goal content and conscientiousness. Applied Psychology 95(4), 618–630 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCrae, R., John, O.: An Introduction to the Five Factor Model and its Applications. Journal of Personality (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goldberg, R.: The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist 48(1), 26–34 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dennis, M., Masthoff, J., Pain, H., Mellish, C.: Does Self-Efficacy Matter When Generating Feedback? In: Biswas, G., Bull, S., Kay, J., Mitrovic, A. (eds.) AIED 2011. LNCS, vol. 6738, pp. 444–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barrick, M.R., Mount, M.K., Strauss, J.P.: Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: test of the mediating effects of goal setting. App. Psy. 78, 715–722 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dennis, M., Masthoff, J., Melllish, C.: The Quest for Validated Personality Trait Stories. Intelligent User Interfaces, 273–276 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taylor, W.L.: Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly 30, 415–433 (1953)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computing ScienceUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations