Conflict and the Complexity of Cognitive Processes

Chapter
Part of the Understanding Complex Systems book series (UCS)

Abstract

From the perspective of Dynamical Systems Theory, the collapse of complexity is one of the crucial phenomena involved in conflict escalation and intractability. It happens when the relations between distinct psychological or social elements involved in conflict become aligned and begin to mutually reinforce each other. At an individual level, a collapse of complexity is reflected in a decrease in the complexity of cognitive processes – the dimensions on which reality is perceived converge, so, at the end of the day it all comes down to being either with us or against us. The first part of this chapter outlines a number of different constructs related to the complexity of cognitive processing, describes their most common measures, and briefly presents their ontogenesis. In the second part, the empirical evidence for the impairment of cognitive capacities in a situation of social conflict is shown. Finally, the Dynamical Systems Theory approach to conflict is briefly presented; focus is placed on the role of complexity, in the processes both of conflict escalation and of conflict resolution.

Keywords

Cognitive Capacity Personal Construct Cognitive Complexity Integrative Complexity Complex Information Processing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., Sanford, R.N.: The Authoritarian Personality. Harper and Row, New York (1950)Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G.: The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1954)Google Scholar
  3. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K.Y.A.: The contact hypothesis reconsidered: interacting via the Internet. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 11(3), article 7 (2006), http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue3/amichai-hamburger.html. Retrieved 15 Apr 2011
  4. Baker-Brown, G., Ballard, E.J., Bluck, S., de Vries, B., Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P.E.: The conceptual/integrative complexity scoring manual. In: Smith, C.P., Atkinson, J.W., McClelland, D.C., Veroff, J. (eds.) Motivation and Personality: Handbook of Thematic Content Analysis, pp. 393–418. Cambridge University Press, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  5. Bieri, J.: Cognitive complexity-simplicity and predictive behavior. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 51, 263–268 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bieri, J., Atkins, A.L., Briar, S., Leaman, R.L., Miller, H., Tripodi, T.: Clinical and Social Judgement: The Discrimination of Behavioral Information. Wiley, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  7. Chandler, M.J.: Adolescence, egocentrism, and epistemological loneliness. In B.Z. Presseisen, D. Goldstein, M.H. Appel (Eds.) Topics in Cognitive development, vol. 2. Plenum, New York: (1978)Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, P.T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallacher, R., Nowak, A.: Protracted conflicts as dynamical systems: guidelines and methods for intervention. In: Schneider, A., Honeyman, C. (eds.) The Negotiator’s Fieldbook, pp. 61–74. American Bar Association Book, Chicago (2006)Google Scholar
  9. Coleman, P.T., Vallacher, R., Nowak, A., Bui-Wrzosińska, L.: Intractable conflict as an attractor: presenting a dynamical model of conflict, escalation, and intractability. Am. Behav. Sci. 50(11), 1454–1475 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crain, W.C.: Theories of Development. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (1985)Google Scholar
  11. Crockett, W.H.: Cognitive complexity and impression formation. In: Maher, B.A. (ed.) Progress in Experimental Personality Research, vol. 2, pp. 47–90. Academic, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  12. Deutsch, M.: The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. Yale University Press, New Haven (1973)Google Scholar
  13. Festinger, L.: A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Row, Peterson, Evanston (1957)Google Scholar
  14. Golec, A.: Cognitive skills as predictor of attitudes toward political conflict: a study of Polish politicians. Polit. Psychol. 23(4), 731–759 (2002a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Golec, A.: Konflikt polityczny. Myślenie i emocje. Wydawnictwo Akademickie Dialog, Warszawa (2002b)Google Scholar
  16. Guetzkow, H.: A use of simulation in the study of inter-nation relations. Behav. Sci. 4, 183–191 (1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guttieri, K., Wallace, M.D., Suedfeld, P.: The integrative complexity of American decision makers in the Cuban missile crisis. J. Confl. Resolut. 39, 595–621 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heider, F.: The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. John Wiley, New York (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hermann, M.G.: Assessing the personalities of Soviet Politburo members. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 6, 332–352 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelly, G.A.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Norton, New York (1955)Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, T.R.: Leader complexity and leadership style. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol, 16, 166–174 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Myers, R.: Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nowak, A., Vallacher, R., Bui-Wrzosińska, L., Coleman, P.T.: Attracted to conflict: a dynamical perspective on malignant social relations. In: Golec, A., Skarżynska, K. (eds.) Understanding Social Change: Political Psychology in Poland. Nova Science Publishers Ltd., Hauppauge (2006)Google Scholar
  24. O’Keefe, D.J., Shepherd, G.J., Streeter, T.: Role category questionnaire measures of cognitive complexity: reliability and comparability of alternative forms. Cent. States Speech J. 33, 333–338 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Piaget, J.: Six études de psychologie. Edition Gonthier, Genève (1964)Google Scholar
  26. Raphael, T.D.: Integrative complexity theory and forecasting international crises: Berlin 1946–1962. J. Confl. Resolut. 26(3), 423–450 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenberg, S.W.: Reason, Ideology and Politics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1988)Google Scholar
  28. Schroder, H.M., Driver, M.J., Streufert, S.: Human Information Processing. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  29. Scott, W.A.: Cognitive complexity and cognitive flexibility. Sociometry 25, 405–414 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scott, W.A., Osgood, D.W., Peterson, C.: Cognitive Structure: Theory and Measurement of Individual Differences. Winston, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  31. Seaman, J.M., Koenig, F.: A comparison of measures of cognitive complexity. Sociometry 37, 375–391 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sidanius, J.: Cognitive functioning and socio-political ideology: an explorative study. Percept. Mot. Skills 46, 515–530 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Solomon, S., Bottazzi, G., Brée, D.S., Cantono, S., Louzoun, Y., Shnerb, N.M., Nowak, A., Vignes, A., Weisbuch, G.: Common Complex Collective Phenomena: Implications for Economic and Social Policy Making. E. Bendyk and A. Zdrodowska, Warsaw (2009)Google Scholar
  34. Suedfeld, P.: Indices of world tension in The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Polit. Psychol. 2(3/4), 114–123 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Suedfeld, P., Bluck, S.: Changes in integrative complexity prior to surprise attacks. J. Confl. Resolut. 32, 626–635 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P.: Integrative complexity of communications in international crises. J. Confl. Resolut. 21, 169–184 (1977)Google Scholar
  37. Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P.E., Ramirez, C.: War, peace, and integrative complexity. J. Confl. Resolut. 21, 427–442 (1977)Google Scholar
  38. Suedfeld, P., Tetlock, P.E., Streufert, S.: Conceptual/integrative complexity. In: Smith, C.P., Atkinson, J.W., McClelland, D.C., Veroff, J. (eds.) Motivation and Personality: Handbook of Thematic Content Analysis, pp. 393–400. Cambridge University Press, New York (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thagard, P., Nerb, J.: Emotional gestalts: appraisal, change, and the dynamics of affect. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6, 274–282 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vallacher, R.R., Nowak, A., Kaufman, J.: Intrinsic dynamics of social judgment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 66, 20–34 (1994)Google Scholar
  41. Vallacher, R.R., Read, S.J., Nowak, A.: Special issue: the dynamical perspective in personality and social psychology. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 6(4), 264–388 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Hiel, A., Mervielde, I.: The measurement of cognitive complexity and its relationship with political extremism. Polit. Psychol. 24(4), 781–801 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vannoy, J.S.: Generality of cognitive complexity-simplicity as a personality construct. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2, 385–396 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zimbardo, P.G.: Psychology and Life, 13th edn. Harper Collins, New York (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations