Advertisement

SAT Encoding of Unification in \(\mathcal{ELH}_{{R}^+}\) w.r.t. Cycle-Restricted Ontologies

  • Franz Baader
  • Stefan Borgwardt
  • Barbara Morawska
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7364)

Abstract

Unification in Description Logics has been proposed as an inference service that can, for example, be used to detect redundancies in ontologies. For the Description Logic \(\mathcal{EL}\), which is used to define several large biomedical ontologies, unification is NP-complete. An NP unification algorithm for \(\mathcal{EL}\) based on a translation into propositional satisfiability (SAT) has recently been presented. In this paper, we extend this SAT encoding in two directions: on the one hand, we add general concept inclusion axioms, and on the other hand, we add role hierarchies (\(\mathcal{H}\)) and transitive roles (R  + ). For the translation to be complete, however, the ontology needs to satisfy a certain cycle restriction. The SAT translation depends on a new rewriting-based characterization of subsumption w.r.t. \(\mathcal{ELH}_{{R}^+}\)-ontologies.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Baader, F., Borgwardt, S., Morawska, B.: Unification in the description logic \(\mathcal{EL}\) w.r.t. cycle-restricted TBoxes. LTCS-Report 11-05, Theoretical Computer Science, TU Dresden (2011), http://lat.inf.tu-dresden.de/research/reports.html
  2. 2.
    Baader, F., Borgwardt, S., Morawska, B.: Extending unification in \(\mathcal{EL}\) towards general TBoxes. In: Proc. of the 13th Int. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. AAAI Press (2012) (short paper)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baader, F., Borgwardt, S., Morawska, B.: SAT encoding of unification in \(\mathcal{ELH}_{{R}^{+}}\) w.r.t. cycle-restricted ontologies. LTCS-Report 12-02, Theoretical Computer Science, TU Dresden (2012), http://lat.inf.tu-dresden.de/research/reports.html
  4. 4.
    Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\mathcal{EL}\) envelope. In: Kaelbling, L.P., Saffiotti, A. (eds.) Proc. of the 19th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 364–369. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baader, F., Morawska, B.: Unification in the Description Logic \(\mathcal{EL}\). In: Treinen, R. (ed.) RTA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5595, pp. 350–364. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baader, F., Morawska, B.: SAT Encoding of Unification in \(\mathcal{EL}\). In: Fermüller, C.G., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-17. LNCS, vol. 6397, pp. 97–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baader, F., Morawska, B.: Unification in the description logic \(\mathcal{EL}\). Logical Methods in Computer Science 6(3) (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baader, F., Narendran, P.: Unification of concept terms in description logics. J. of Symbolic Computation 31(3), 277–305 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baader, F., Snyder, W.: Unification theory. In: Robinson, J.A., Voronkov, A. (eds.) Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 445–532. The MIT Press (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T. (eds.): Handbook of Satisfiability. IOS Press (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brandt, S.: Polynomial time reasoning in a description logic with existential restrictions, GCI axioms, and—what else? In: de Mántaras, R.L., Saitta, L. (eds.) Proc. of the 16th Eur. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 298–302 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Campbell, J.R., Lopez Osornio, A., de Quiros, F., Luna, D., Reynoso, G.: Semantic interoperability and SNOMED CT: A case study in clinical problem lists. In: Kuhn, K., Warren, J., Leong, T.Y. (eds.) Proc. of the 12th World Congress on Health (Medical) Informatics, pp. 2401–2402. IOS Press (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Degtyarev, A., Voronkov, A.: The undecidability of simultaneous rigid E-unification. Theor. Comput. Sci. 166(1&2), 291–300 (1996)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gallier, J.H., Narendran, P., Plaisted, D.A., Snyder, W.: Rigid E-unification: NP-completeness and applications to equational matings. Inf. Comput. 87(1/2), 129–195 (1990)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seidenberg, J., Rector, A.L.: Representing Transitive Propagation in OWL. In: Embley, D.W., Olivé, A., Ram, S. (eds.) ER 2006. LNCS, vol. 4215, pp. 255–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sofronie-Stokkermans, V.: Locality and subsumption testing in \(\mathcal{EL}\) and some of its extensions. In: Proc. Advances in Modal Logic (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suntisrivaraporn, B., Baader, F., Schulz, S., Spackman, K.: Replacing SEP-Triplets in SNOMED CT Using Tractable Description Logic Operators. In: Bellazzi, R., Abu-Hanna, A., Hunter, J. (eds.) AIME 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4594, pp. 287–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Franz Baader
    • 1
  • Stefan Borgwardt
    • 1
  • Barbara Morawska
    • 1
  1. 1.Theoretical Computer ScienceTU DresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations