A New Procedure for Determining Parameter Values in the Barcelona Basic Model
The Barcelona Basic Model (BBM) is one of the most popular elasto-plastic models for unsaturated soils. However, determination of parameter values from experimental data is often not straightforward and this has hindered dissemination of the model among practitioners. The main difficulty is related to the calibration of the isotropic virgin response as individual aspects of soil behaviour are controlled in BBM by multiple parameters while a single parameter can control more than one aspect of soil behaviour. As a consequence, iterative calibration procedures are common practice, where parameter values are adjusted in turn to match experiments. These procedures require significant experience, are time consuming and often lead to different parameter values. In this context, a new calibration method for the isotropic virgin behaviour in BBM is proposed where each parameter is determined in a specific order without making assumptions on remaining ones. The procedure, which is objective, simple and robust, has the potential of increasing the appeal of BBM for practitioners.
Keywordsparameters determination unsaturated soils constitutive modelling Barcelona Basic Model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barrera Bucio, M.: Estudio experimental del comportamiento hidro-mecánico de suelos colapsables. Ph.D. Thesis (2002)Google Scholar
- Cui, Y.J., Sun, D.A.: Constitutive modelling: From isothermal to non-isothermal behaviour of unsaturated soils. In: Buzzi, O., Fityus, S.G., Sheng, D. (eds.) Unsaturated Soils—Theoretical & Numerical Advances in Unsaturated Soil Mechanics, pp. 493–506. CRC Press (2009)Google Scholar
- Sheng, D.: Constitutive modelling of unsaturated soils: Discussion of fundamental principles. In: Alonso, E., Gens, A. (eds.) Unsaturated Soils, pp. 91–112. CRC Press (2011)Google Scholar
- Wheeler, S.J., Karube, D.: Constitutive modelling. In: Alonso, E.E., Delage, P. (eds.) Unsaturated Soils, Balkema, Rotterdam, vol. 3, pp. 1323–1356 (1996)Google Scholar