Comparison of Breast Doses for Digital Tomosynthesis Estimated from Patient Exposures and Using PMMA Breast Phantoms

  • David R. Dance
  • Celia J. Strudley
  • Kenneth C. Young
  • Jennifer M. Oduko
  • Patsy J. Whelehan
  • E. H. Lindsay Mungutroy
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7361)

Abstract

A proposed European protocol for dosimetry in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has been applied to estimate the average glandular breast dose (AGD) for two different DBT units. AGD was measured for the examination of series of women and for breast-simulating polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) phantoms, thus assessing the suitability of the phantoms used for dosimetry in 2D mammography for DBT dosimetry. For the first system the mean values of the AGD for breast thicknesses of 21mm, 53mm and 90mm, were 1.21±0.06 (2 s.e.m), 2.12±0.07 and 4.90±0.11 mGy respectively. The corresponding values for the equivalent PMMA thicknesses of 20mm, 45mm and 70mm were 0.92, 2.08 and 4.65 mGy respectively. Similar agreement was found for the second system. It is concluded that the use of standard PMMA phantoms of appropriate thicknesses (as used for 2D dosimetry) to simulate the breast in DBT provides a reasonable estimate of the AGD.

Keywords

digital breast tomosynthesis average glandular dose PMMA phantoms breast dosimetry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    European Commission (EC): European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis 4th (edn.). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dance, D.R., Young, K.C., van Engen, R.E.: Estimation of mean glandular dose for breast tomosynthesis: factors for use with the UK, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols. Phys. Med. Biol. 56, 453–471 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dance, D.R.: Monte Carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose. Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 1211–1219 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dance, D.R., Skinner, C.L., Young, K.C., Beckett, J.R., Kotre, C.J.: Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol. Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3225–3240 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dance, D.R., Young, K.C., van Engen, R.E.: Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA dosimetry protocols. Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 4361–4372 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. Dance
    • 1
    • 2
  • Celia J. Strudley
    • 1
  • Kenneth C. Young
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jennifer M. Oduko
    • 1
  • Patsy J. Whelehan
    • 3
  • E. H. Lindsay Mungutroy
    • 4
  1. 1.Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation TrustNational Co-ordinating Centre for the Physics of MammographyGuildfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Physics, Faculty of Engineering and Physical SciencesUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  3. 3.Division of Cancer Research, Medical Research InstituteUniversity of DundeeDundeeUK
  4. 4.Jarvis Breast Screening and Diagnostic CentreGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations