Advertisement

Dynamic Diagrams: A Composition Alternative

  • Richard Lowe
  • Jean-Michel Boucheix
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7352)

Abstract

A major problem that learners face in comprehending animated diagrams is in decomposing the presented information into a form that furnishes appropriate raw material for building high quality mental models. This paper proposes an alternative to existing design approaches that shifts the prime focus from the nature of the external representation to the internal composition activity learners engage in during mental model construction.

Keywords

dynamic diagrams decomposition composition comprehension 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lowe, R.K., Schnotz, W., Rasch, T.: Aligning affordances of graphics with learning task requirements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 452–459 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hegarty, M.: The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1–29 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schnotz, W., Lowe, R.K.: A unified view of learning from animated and static graphics. In: Lowe, R.K., Schnotz, W. (eds.) Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design, pp. 304–356. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Koning, B.B., Tabbers, H.K., Rikers, R.M.J.P., Paas, F.: Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review 21, 113–140 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lowe, R.K., Boucheix, J.-M.: Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learning and Instruction 21, 650–663 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kriz, S., Hegarty, M.: Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 65, 911–930 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amadieu, F., Mariné, C., Laimay, C.: The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 36–40 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayer, R.E., Mathais, A., Wetzell, K.: Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8, 147–154 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lowe, R., Boucheix, J.-M.: Learning from Animated Diagrams: How Are Mental Models Built? In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 266–281. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mayer, R.E.: Research-Based Principles for Learning with Animation. In: Lowe, R.K., Schnotz, W. (eds.) Learning with Animation. Research Implications for Design, pp. 30–48. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson-Laird, P.N.: How We Reason. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jahn, G., Knauff, M., Johnson-Laird, P.N.: Preferred mental models in reasoning about spatial relations. Memory & Cognition 35, 2075–2086 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hyönä, J.: The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction 20, 172–176 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jarodzka, H., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Van Gog, T.: In the eyes of the beholder: How experts and novices interpret dynamic stimuli. Learning and Instruction 20, 146–154 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kurby, A., Zacks, J.: Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Science 12, 72–79 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lowe, R.K., Boucheix, J.M.: Unfair Competition: Static. Cues in Animated Graphics. Poster presented at the Comprehension of Text and Graphic, SIG 2 Meeting, Tubingen, Germany (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khooshabeh, P., Hegarty, M.: Inferring Cross-Sections: When Internal Visualizations Are More Important Than Properties of External Visualizations. Human Computer Interaction 25(2), 119–147 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lowe, R., Boucheix, J.-M.: Supporting Relational Processing in Complex Animated Diagrams. In: Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Lee, J. (eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5223, pp. 391–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Lowe
    • 1
  • Jean-Michel Boucheix
    • 2
  1. 1.Curtin UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.University of BurgundyFrance

Personalised recommendations