Towards an Integration of Multiple Process Improvement Reference Models Based on Automated Concept Extraction

  • Simona Jeners
  • Horst Lichter
  • Ana Dragomir
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 301)

Abstract

A variety of process improvement reference models (IRM) such as CMMI, COBIT or ITIL support IT organizations. These reference models cover different domains (e.g. IT development, IT Services or IT Governance) but also share some similarities. There are organizations that address multiple domains and want to use different IRMs. As IRMs are described in different structures and are using different terminologies, we propose a tool based approach to extract IRMs’ concepts and to normalize the terminologies. Our solution enables to semi-automatically build an integrated database of IRMs’ concepts based on common meta-models and on a common terminology.

Keywords

process improvement improvement reference models natural language processing CMMI 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    The Standish Group International: CHAOS Summary 2009, Chaos, pp. 1–4 (2009), http://www.statelibrary.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/document/690719/ (retrieved)
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC TR 24774: Systems and software engineering – Life Cycle Management – Guide-lines for process descriptions (2010) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pricope, S., Lichter, H.: A Model Based Integration Approach for Reference Models. In: Caivano, D., et al. (eds.) 2nd Proceedings of 12th Int. Conference on Product Focused Software Development and Process Improvement, Torre Canne, Italy, June 20-22, pp. 6–9. ACM, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferchichi, A., Bigand, M.: An Ontology for Quality Standards Integration in Software Collaborative Projects. In: Proceedings of MDISIS 2008, Model Driven Interoperability for Sustainable Information Systems, Montpellier, France. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 340, pp. 17–30 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liao, L., Qu, Y., Leung, H.: A Software Process Ontology and Its Application. In: Proceedings of IWFST 2005, Int. Workshop on Future Software Technology, Shanghai, pp 1–10 (2005) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malzahn, D.: Assessing - Learning - Improving, an Integrated Approach for Self Assessment and Process Improvement Systems. In: Proceedings of ICONS 2009, Fourth International Conference on Systems, Gosier, Guadeloupe, France, pp. 126–130 (2009), doi:10.1109/ICONS.2009.31Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siviy, J., Kirwan, P., Marino, L., Morley, J.: Process Architecture in a Multimodel Envi-ronment. White Paper, Software Engineering Institute, CarnegieMellon (2008), http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/whitepapers/multimodelSeries_wp4_processArch_052008_v1.cfm
  8. 8.
    Wang, Y., King, G., Dorling, A., Wickberg, H.: A unified framework for the software engineering process system standards and models. In: Proceeding ISESS 1999 Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium and Forum on Software Engineering Standards, p. 132. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soto, M., Münch, J.: Using Model Comparison to Maintain Model-to-Standard Compliance. In: Proceedings of the ICSE Workshop Comparison and Versioning of Software Models (CVSM 2008), Leipzig, Germany, May 17, pp. 35–40 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jeners, S.: MoSaIC Reference Model Modeling Rules, Software Construction Group (2012), www.swc.rwth-aachen.de/DOCUMENTS/MOSAIC/EuroSPI/ModelingRules.pdf
  11. 11.
    Grinder, J., Bandler, R.: The Structure of Magic II: A Book about Communication and Change. Science and Behavior Books, Palo Alto (1976)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pohl, K., Rupp, C.: Requirements Engineering Fundamentals – A study Guide for the Certified Professional Requirements Engineering Exam – Foundation Level – IREB compliant. Rocky Nook, Inc., Santa Barbara (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kao, A., Poteet, S.R.: Natural Language Processing and Text Mining. Springer, London (2007)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cunningham, H., Maynard, D., Bontcheva, K., et al.: Text Processing with GATE (Version 6), University of Sheffield Department of Computer Science, April 15 (2011), http://gate.ac.uk/releases/gate-6.1-build3913-ALL/tao.pdf
  15. 15.
    Zhou, X., Zhang, X., Hu, X.: The Dragon Toolkit Developer Guide, http://dragon.ischool.drexel.edu/tutorial.pdf
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Ramshaw, L., Marcus, M.: Text Chunking Using Transformation-Based Learning. In: Proceedings of the Third ACL Workshop on Very Large Corpora, pp. 82–94 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simona Jeners
    • 1
  • Horst Lichter
    • 1
  • Ana Dragomir
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Group Software ConstructionRWTH Aachen UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations